The Restitution of the Sacred: Faith, Property, and Legal Reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina

This article examines the restitution of ecclesiastical property in Bosnia and Herzegovina as a key test of post-socialist constitutionalism and religious freedom. It outlines the socialist legacy of nationalization and its lasting effects on the legal status of religious communities in the region. In Bosnia, the consociational system created by the Dayton Accords, together with fragmented competences and political resistance, has hindered the implementation of restitution and produced structural inequality. The European Court of Human Rights’ judgment in Orlović and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina illustrates how non-enforcement of property rights undermines both minority protection and confessional pluralism. The article argues that effective ecclesiastical restitution is essential for rebuilding trust, ensuring legal certainty, and consolidating a genuinely pluralist democratic order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stato Chiese e pluralismo confessionale
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/30681
Primary Topic
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Restitution of the Sacred: Faith, Property, and Legal Reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Federica Botti
Stato Chiese e pluralismo confessionale
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
article

The Restitution of the Sacred: Faith, Property, and Legal Reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Federica Botti
article en

Abstract

This article examines the restitution of ecclesiastical property in Bosnia and Herzegovina as a key test of post-socialist constitutionalism and religious freedom. It outlines the socialist legacy of nationalization and its lasting effects on the legal status of religious communities in the region. In Bosnia, the consociational system created by the Dayton Accords, together with fragmented competences and political resistance, has hindered the implementation of restitution and produced structural inequality. The European Court of Human Rights’ judgment in Orlović and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina illustrates how non-enforcement of property rights undermines both minority protection and confessional pluralism. The article argues that effective ecclesiastical restitution is essential for rebuilding trust, ensuring legal certainty, and consolidating a genuinely pluralist democratic order.

Stato Chiese e pluralismo confessionale
University of Bologna (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Restitution of the Sacred: Faith, Property, and Legal Reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina — Federica Botti · Stato Chiese e pluralismo confessionale (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS