Finite Element Analysis for the Stationary Navier–Stokes Equations with Mixed Boundary Conditions

This paper studies the stationary incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with mixed boundary conditions using a velocity-pressure finite element formulation. We first establish a variational framework and prove existence of solutions under suitable regularity assumptions, followed by a Galerkin discretization with error estimates. Three iterative algorithms (the Stokes, Newton, and Oseen schemes) are then analyzed, with stability conditions and error bounds derived for each. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical results: all methods achieve second-order convergence for velocity and pressure. Among the three schemes, the Newton iteration is the most efficient in terms of computational time, while the Oseen iteration exhibits the strongest robustness with respect to decreasing viscosity coefficients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14020333
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite Element Analysis for the Stationary Navier–Stokes Equations with Mixed Boundary Conditions

Lei Ding, Jia Liu, Ya Cui
Mathematics
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
article

Finite Element Analysis for the Stationary Navier–Stokes Equations with Mixed Boundary Conditions

Lei Ding, Jia Liu, Ya Cui
article en

Abstract

This paper studies the stationary incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with mixed boundary conditions using a velocity-pressure finite element formulation. We first establish a variational framework and prove existence of solutions under suitable regularity assumptions, followed by a Galerkin discretization with error estimates. Three iterative algorithms (the Stokes, Newton, and Oseen schemes) are then analyzed, with stability conditions and error bounds derived for each. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical results: all methods achieve second-order convergence for velocity and pressure. Among the three schemes, the Newton iteration is the most efficient in terms of computational time, while the Oseen iteration exhibits the strongest robustness with respect to decreasing viscosity coefficients.

MathematicsVol. 14(2)
Ya'an Polytechnic College (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Finite Element Analysis for the Stationary Navier–Stokes Equations with Mixed Boundary Conditions — Lei Ding, Jia Liu, et al. · Mathematics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS