Carbon tax, renewable portfolio Standards, or both? Evaluating policy effectiveness in promoting renewable energy and reducing emissions

The transition to a low-carbon economy is a critical global challenge. However, the relative effectiveness of renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and carbon tax policies, particularly their potential synergistic effects, remains insufficiently understood. Clarifying this relationship is essential for designing effective policies that enhance renewable energy investment and reduce carbon emissions. We develop an optimization framework in which a monopolistic electricity supplier in China invests in a hybrid energy system of conventional and renewable power. We compare profit-maximizing strategies under four policy scenarios: no policy, a carbon tax, an RPS, and a mixed policy (carbon tax + RPS). The analysis examines how these policies shape production and pricing decisions, investment, emissions, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Three main findings emerge. First, both carbon tax and RPS policies significantly encourage renewable energy investment and reduce carbon emissions. Second, mixed policies consistently outperform single policies, demonstrating the highest potential for renewable energy development and carbon emission reduction. Third, social welfare effects under mixed policies vary depending on the carbon tax and renewable energy quota level, with the highest social welfare achieved under low and medium quotas. Importantly, renewable intermittency does not alter the relative ranking of policies, though consumer environmental awareness shifts investment thresholds. Based on these findings, three recommendations emerge: integrating carbon tax with RPS accelerates renewable deployment, phased emission reduction balances neutrality targets with electricity demand, and incentives linking green electricity with consumer awareness strengthen adoption. These results provide actionable policy guidance for China and offer broader insights for economies pursuing a sustainable low-carbon transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment Development and Sustainability
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-07203-2
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon tax, renewable portfolio Standards, or both? Evaluating policy effectiveness in promoting renewable energy and reducing emissions

Qi Sun, Dandan Wu, Hongyan Jenny Li, Hao Ding et al.
Environment Development and Sustainability
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Carbon tax, renewable portfolio Standards, or both? Evaluating policy effectiveness in promoting renewable energy and reducing emissions

Qi Sun, Dandan Wu, Hongyan Jenny Li, Hao Ding, Wei WANG, Yang Cheng
article en

Abstract

The transition to a low-carbon economy is a critical global challenge. However, the relative effectiveness of renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and carbon tax policies, particularly their potential synergistic effects, remains insufficiently understood. Clarifying this relationship is essential for designing effective policies that enhance renewable energy investment and reduce carbon emissions. We develop an optimization framework in which a monopolistic electricity supplier in China invests in a hybrid energy system of conventional and renewable power. We compare profit-maximizing strategies under four policy scenarios: no policy, a carbon tax, an RPS, and a mixed policy (carbon tax + RPS). The analysis examines how these policies shape production and pricing decisions, investment, emissions, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Three main findings emerge. First, both carbon tax and RPS policies significantly encourage renewable energy investment and reduce carbon emissions. Second, mixed policies consistently outperform single policies, demonstrating the highest potential for renewable energy development and carbon emission reduction. Third, social welfare effects under mixed policies vary depending on the carbon tax and renewable energy quota level, with the highest social welfare achieved under low and medium quotas. Importantly, renewable intermittency does not alter the relative ranking of policies, though consumer environmental awareness shifts investment thresholds. Based on these findings, three recommendations emerge: integrating carbon tax with RPS accelerates renewable deployment, phased emission reduction balances neutrality targets with electricity demand, and incentives linking green electricity with consumer awareness strengthen adoption. These results provide actionable policy guidance for China and offer broader insights for economies pursuing a sustainable low-carbon transition.

Environment Development and Sustainability
Aarhus University (DK), University of Skövde (SE), Aarhus Business College (DK), China University of Petroleum, East China (CN), Aalborg University (DK)
Aalborg Universitet, National Development and Reform Commission, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.