Impact of symptom duration on the short- and long-term efficacy of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: results up to 2 years

Bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, showed efficacy to 2 years in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). In this post hoc analysis, we compare the impact of shorter versus longer symptom duration on the efficacy of bimekizumab to Week 104. Efficacy outcomes by symptom duration (≤ 2 [ASAS early axSpA definition] versus > 2 years; ≤ 5 versus > 5 years) were assessed across patients from BE MOBILE 1 and 2 (non-radiographic [NCT03928704]/radiographic axSpA [NCT03928743]) and the combined open-label extension (NCT04436640). (Relative) odds ratios and (relative) differences were calculated to compare 16-week bimekizumab versus placebo treatment effect and 104-week outcomes, and infer the significance of differences, between symptom duration subgroups. Analyses were neither powered for these comparisons nor multiplicity adjusted, and should be interpreted accordingly. Improved disease activity, physical function, fatigue, health-related quality of life and objective signs of inflammation were seen with bimekizumab versus placebo at Week 16 regardless of symptom duration. Outcomes were then sustained or improved with bimekizumab to Week 104 across all subgroups. 16-week bimekizumab versus placebo treatment effect was comparable between subgroups (e.g., ≤ 2-year versus > 2-year symptom duration relative odds ratio [95% CI] for ASDAS < 2.1 in BE MOBILE 1: 0.82 [0.22, 3.08]). Significant differences were observed for some 104-week outcomes between symptom duration subgroups across both studies (e.g., ≤ 5-year versus > 5-year symptom duration odds ratio [95% CI] for ASDAS < 2.1 in BE MOBILE 2: 1.94 [1.02, 3.68]), all favouring the shorter symptom duration subgroups. Bimekizumab was efficacious to 2 years regardless of symptom duration, with comparable 16-week treatment effect but generally better 104-week outcomes in the shorter versus longer symptom duration subgroups. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03928704 (BE MOBILE 1; 23rd April 2019), NCT03928743 (BE MOBILE 2; 23rd April 2019), NCT04436640 (BE MOVING; 15th June 2020).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-026-03729-6
Primary Topic
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of symptom duration on the short- and long-term efficacy of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: results up to 2 years

Sarah Kavanagh, Astrid M van Tubergen, Lianne S. Gensler, Fabian Proft et al.
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
article

Impact of symptom duration on the short- and long-term efficacy of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: results up to 2 years

Sarah Kavanagh, Astrid M van Tubergen, Lianne S. Gensler, Fabian Proft, V. Taieb, Raj Sengupta, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Anna Moltó, Shawna Evans, Sofia Ramiro
article en

Abstract

Bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, showed efficacy to 2 years in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). In this post hoc analysis, we compare the impact of shorter versus longer symptom duration on the efficacy of bimekizumab to Week 104. Efficacy outcomes by symptom duration (≤ 2 [ASAS early axSpA definition] versus > 2 years; ≤ 5 versus > 5 years) were assessed across patients from BE MOBILE 1 and 2 (non-radiographic [NCT03928704]/radiographic axSpA [NCT03928743]) and the combined open-label extension (NCT04436640). (Relative) odds ratios and (relative) differences were calculated to compare 16-week bimekizumab versus placebo treatment effect and 104-week outcomes, and infer the significance of differences, between symptom duration subgroups. Analyses were neither powered for these comparisons nor multiplicity adjusted, and should be interpreted accordingly. Improved disease activity, physical function, fatigue, health-related quality of life and objective signs of inflammation were seen with bimekizumab versus placebo at Week 16 regardless of symptom duration. Outcomes were then sustained or improved with bimekizumab to Week 104 across all subgroups. 16-week bimekizumab versus placebo treatment effect was comparable between subgroups (e.g., ≤ 2-year versus > 2-year symptom duration relative odds ratio [95% CI] for ASDAS < 2.1 in BE MOBILE 1: 0.82 [0.22, 3.08]). Significant differences were observed for some 104-week outcomes between symptom duration subgroups across both studies (e.g., ≤ 5-year versus > 5-year symptom duration odds ratio [95% CI] for ASDAS < 2.1 in BE MOBILE 2: 1.94 [1.02, 3.68]), all favouring the shorter symptom duration subgroups. Bimekizumab was efficacious to 2 years regardless of symptom duration, with comparable 16-week treatment effect but generally better 104-week outcomes in the shorter versus longer symptom duration subgroups. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03928704 (BE MOBILE 1; 23rd April 2019), NCT03928743 (BE MOBILE 2; 23rd April 2019), NCT04436640 (BE MOVING; 15th June 2020).

Arthritis Research & TherapyVol. 28(1)
Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB), Inserm (FR), University of California, San Francisco (US), Kyorin University (JP), Université Paris Cité (FR), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), UCB Pharma (France) (FR), Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Biologie (FR), Hôpital Nord (FR), Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL), Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.