Openness, Innovation, and the Reflexive University: Rethinking Knowledge Governance

This article critically examines how two originally distinct concepts – openness, rooted in transparency and democratic access, and innovation, tied to economic valorisation and competitiveness –have been aligned through policy reforms, evaluative regimes, and digital infrastructures. Drawing on neo-institutionalist theory and comparative empirical cases from Europe, China, Latin America, and Africa, it interrogates the institutional and epistemic consequences of this convergence. The analysis demonstrates how open science and innovation have been reframed as instruments of performative governance, narrowing epistemic diversity and reshaping legitimacy in the name of accountability and impact. While alternative practices and platforms offer civic and pluralist counter-models, the managerial paradigm remains structurally dominant. The article explores the entanglement of openness and innovation with broader transformations in knowledge capitalism and calls for reflexivity in knowledge governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education Policy and Practice
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5117/ejep2025.1.004.ruan
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Openness, Innovation, and the Reflexive University: Rethinking Knowledge Governance

Jean‐Claude Ruano‐Borbalan
European Journal of Education Policy and Practice
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
article

Openness, Innovation, and the Reflexive University: Rethinking Knowledge Governance

Jean‐Claude Ruano‐Borbalan
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines how two originally distinct concepts – openness, rooted in transparency and democratic access, and innovation, tied to economic valorisation and competitiveness –have been aligned through policy reforms, evaluative regimes, and digital infrastructures. Drawing on neo-institutionalist theory and comparative empirical cases from Europe, China, Latin America, and Africa, it interrogates the institutional and epistemic consequences of this convergence. The analysis demonstrates how open science and innovation have been reframed as instruments of performative governance, narrowing epistemic diversity and reshaping legitimacy in the name of accountability and impact. While alternative practices and platforms offer civic and pluralist counter-models, the managerial paradigm remains structurally dominant. The article explores the entanglement of openness and innovation with broader transformations in knowledge capitalism and calls for reflexivity in knowledge governance.

European Journal of Education Policy and PracticeVol. 1(1)
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR), Institute for European Environmental Policy (BE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.