Comparing radical left parties’ positions on Ukraine and Israel: between Russophilia and anti-Semitism?

We provide a comparative analysis of how European radical left parties (RLPs) politicise the Israel–Palestine and Russia–Ukraine conflicts. Examining the positions of 25 RLPs, we test four hypotheses examining variation in Israel-hostility, Russia-related stances, cross-conflict coherence, and the dynamics of war fatigue. Patterns of politicisation are complex and there is no unified party family response. We show that while no RLP is Israel-friendly, levels of Israel-hostility vary substantially and tend to intensify as the Gaza war persists. By contrast, positions on Russia–Ukraine remain deeply divided, with no linear shift towards Russia-friendliness. Ideological subtype shapes, but does not determine, party responses, while broader contextual factors, most notably the ‘Trump effect’, repoliticise questions of European security. However, further politicisation is limited by the weakness of cross-conflict coherence. Several parties express consistent anti-imperialist logic in their response, but most disaggregate their critiques. RLP foreign policy emerges as ideologically-driven but contextually responsive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Integration
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2026.2616337
Citations
2
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
129.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing radical left parties’ positions on Ukraine and Israel: between Russophilia and anti-Semitism?

Luke March, Jakub Wondreys
2 citations
Journal of European Integration
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
129.64
article

Comparing radical left parties’ positions on Ukraine and Israel: between Russophilia and anti-Semitism?

Luke March, Jakub Wondreys
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We provide a comparative analysis of how European radical left parties (RLPs) politicise the Israel–Palestine and Russia–Ukraine conflicts. Examining the positions of 25 RLPs, we test four hypotheses examining variation in Israel-hostility, Russia-related stances, cross-conflict coherence, and the dynamics of war fatigue. Patterns of politicisation are complex and there is no unified party family response. We show that while no RLP is Israel-friendly, levels of Israel-hostility vary substantially and tend to intensify as the Gaza war persists. By contrast, positions on Russia–Ukraine remain deeply divided, with no linear shift towards Russia-friendliness. Ideological subtype shapes, but does not determine, party responses, while broader contextual factors, most notably the ‘Trump effect’, repoliticise questions of European security. However, further politicisation is limited by the weakness of cross-conflict coherence. Several parties express consistent anti-imperialist logic in their response, but most disaggregate their critiques. RLP foreign policy emerges as ideologically-driven but contextually responsive.

Journal of European IntegrationVol. 48(2)
Total (Germany) (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
129.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.