Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation conducts continuous reviews of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science and publishes more comprehensive reviews every 5 years. The Education, Implementation, and Teams chapter of the 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations describes all published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation’s Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force science experts since 2020. This summary addresses the evidence in 4 subchapters: (1) training populations, (2) faculty development, (3) knowledge translation and implementation, and (4) instructional design. Members from the Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task force are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. Priority knowledge gaps for further research are listed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-281564
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations

Tracy Kidd, Katherine S. Allan, Alanowd Alghaith, Barbara Farquharson et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations

Tracy Kidd, Katherine S. Allan, Alanowd Alghaith, Barbara Farquharson, Adam Boulton, Aida Carballo‐Fazanes, Sebastian Schnaubelt, Theresa Aves, Andrew Lockey, Kathryn Eastwood, Alexander Olaussen, Kevin Nation, Aaron Donoghue, Emma Buergstein, Adam Cheng, Joyce Yeung, Natalie Anderson, Cristian Abelairas-Gómez, Robert Greif, et al., Taylor Sawyer, Ming-Ju Hsieh, Kasper G Lauridsen, Jan Breckwoldt, Andrea Cortegiani, Chih-Wei Yang, Jon Duff, Ying-Chih Ko, Yiqun Lin, Sabine Nabecker
article en

Abstract

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation conducts continuous reviews of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science and publishes more comprehensive reviews every 5 years. The Education, Implementation, and Teams chapter of the 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations describes all published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation’s Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force science experts since 2020. This summary addresses the evidence in 4 subchapters: (1) training populations, (2) faculty development, (3) knowledge translation and implementation, and (4) instructional design. Members from the Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task force are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. Priority knowledge gaps for further research are listed.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.