User acceptance of AI chatbot services in public libraries

Purpose This paper aims to explore the determinants that affect users’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot services in public library settings by applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and the information gap theory and to present the implications for revitalizing their use. Design/methodology/approach This study collected data through a survey and verified that the independent variables significantly influenced the dependent variable by conducting a regression analysis that measured both direct and indirect effects. To examine the disparities in use intention across various demographic groups, independent sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, and post hoc tests were performed. Findings AI literacy, facilitating conditions, social influence, performance expectancy and effort expectancy were identified as factors influencing the intention to use AI chatbot services in public libraries. Social influence and AI literacy are crucial predictors. Disparities were observed in the intention to use AI chatbot services based on users’ age, educational level and occupation. Practical implications Word-of-mouth recommendations are crucial for revitalizing AI chatbot services in public libraries, and AI literacy programs can contribute to their popularization. Originality/value Based on the UTAUT and the information gap theory, this study examines the factors influencing AI chatbot service use in public libraries, an underexplored area. The findings provide practical implications for revitalizing AI chatbot services through targeted marketing strategies and the development of AI literacy programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Library
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/el-06-2025-0227
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

User acceptance of AI chatbot services in public libraries

Yu Jeong Kang
The Electronic Library
AI in Service Interactions
article

User acceptance of AI chatbot services in public libraries

Yu Jeong Kang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the determinants that affect users’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot services in public library settings by applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and the information gap theory and to present the implications for revitalizing their use. Design/methodology/approach This study collected data through a survey and verified that the independent variables significantly influenced the dependent variable by conducting a regression analysis that measured both direct and indirect effects. To examine the disparities in use intention across various demographic groups, independent sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, and post hoc tests were performed. Findings AI literacy, facilitating conditions, social influence, performance expectancy and effort expectancy were identified as factors influencing the intention to use AI chatbot services in public libraries. Social influence and AI literacy are crucial predictors. Disparities were observed in the intention to use AI chatbot services based on users’ age, educational level and occupation. Practical implications Word-of-mouth recommendations are crucial for revitalizing AI chatbot services in public libraries, and AI literacy programs can contribute to their popularization. Originality/value Based on the UTAUT and the information gap theory, this study examines the factors influencing AI chatbot service use in public libraries, an underexplored area. The findings provide practical implications for revitalizing AI chatbot services through targeted marketing strategies and the development of AI literacy programs.

The Electronic Library
Oldham Council (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.