Relationship between psychosocial problems and satisfaction with GP communication in German primary care practices: a structural equation model based on the cross-sectional GPCare-1 patient study

ObjectivesThis study examined the relationship between primary care patients’ psychosocial problems, other patient characteristics that are associated with satisfaction with overall care and satisfaction with general practitioner (GP) communication.DesignA cross-sectional survey was conducted. Patients filled an anonymous two-page questionnaire on various socio-demographic, medical characteristics and their satisfaction with GP communication. Structural equation modelling evaluated associations of various patient characteristics, including psychosocial problems with GP communication.SettingGeneral practices in Germany.ParticipantsA total of 813 patients from 12 GP practices participated. The survey was conducted in summer 2020 during a COVID-19 lockdown.ResultsThe estimated response rate was 24.1%. The prevalence of psychosocial problems in the sample was 30%. The three most frequent problems were excessive stress at work (19%), financial problems/debts (9%) and loneliness (8%). Most patients agreed that their GP takes their problems seriously (71%), feeling comfortable talking about sensitive things (66%), having enough space in communication (62%) and being asked by their GP about personal strains (53%). Higher social support, preference to solve one’s problem without GP help, higher age and better health status predicted more satisfaction with physician–patient communication, while the number of psychosocial problems, gender, years with physician, chronic stress and depression had no influence. According to the Bentler Comparative Fit Index, the pooled structural equation model had a 97.6% better fit than the corresponding model without covariate effects.Higher social support, preference to solve one’s problem without GP help, higher age and better health status but not the number of psychosocial problems predicted more satisfaction with physician–patient communication.ConclusionsGPs should be aware of the high occurrence of patients’ psychosocial problems and actively address patients’ social support and self-management preferences which influence patients’ satisfaction with GP communication.Trial registration numberThe General Practice Care-1 study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022330).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-282565
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship between psychosocial problems and satisfaction with GP communication in German primary care practices: a structural equation model based on the cross-sectional GPCare-1 patient study

Maja Oberholz, Carmen Hunzelar, Joana Paños-Willuhn, Boris Gavrilov et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Relationship between psychosocial problems and satisfaction with GP communication in German primary care practices: a structural equation model based on the cross-sectional GPCare-1 patient study

Maja Oberholz, Carmen Hunzelar, Joana Paños-Willuhn, Boris Gavrilov, Thomas Welchowski, Nur Ikar, Juliane Sachschal, Luisa Offenberg, Florian Bockheim, Birgitta Prof. Dr. Weltermann
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study examined the relationship between primary care patients’ psychosocial problems, other patient characteristics that are associated with satisfaction with overall care and satisfaction with general practitioner (GP) communication.DesignA cross-sectional survey was conducted. Patients filled an anonymous two-page questionnaire on various socio-demographic, medical characteristics and their satisfaction with GP communication. Structural equation modelling evaluated associations of various patient characteristics, including psychosocial problems with GP communication.SettingGeneral practices in Germany.ParticipantsA total of 813 patients from 12 GP practices participated. The survey was conducted in summer 2020 during a COVID-19 lockdown.ResultsThe estimated response rate was 24.1%. The prevalence of psychosocial problems in the sample was 30%. The three most frequent problems were excessive stress at work (19%), financial problems/debts (9%) and loneliness (8%). Most patients agreed that their GP takes their problems seriously (71%), feeling comfortable talking about sensitive things (66%), having enough space in communication (62%) and being asked by their GP about personal strains (53%). Higher social support, preference to solve one’s problem without GP help, higher age and better health status predicted more satisfaction with physician–patient communication, while the number of psychosocial problems, gender, years with physician, chronic stress and depression had no influence. According to the Bentler Comparative Fit Index, the pooled structural equation model had a 97.6% better fit than the corresponding model without covariate effects.Higher social support, preference to solve one’s problem without GP help, higher age and better health status but not the number of psychosocial problems predicted more satisfaction with physician–patient communication.ConclusionsGPs should be aware of the high occurrence of patients’ psychosocial problems and actively address patients’ social support and self-management preferences which influence patients’ satisfaction with GP communication.Trial registration numberThe General Practice Care-1 study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022330).

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.