Abutment-free Tissue-Level Implants for Personalized Monolithic Zirconia Implant Crowns: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose: This study aims to compare the peri-implant bone surrounding a new abutment free tissue-level implant design with classic tissue-level implants restored with titanium-base abutments. Results: No significant differences in patient demographics or complications were found between abutment-free and conventional implants. However, abutment-free implants exhibited less buccal bone loss than traditional implants. The abutment-free implant group had significantly lower buccal bone loss (p-values of 0.025 and 0.024 for oral palatal/lingual bone and alveolar ridge width, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that abutment-free dental implants offer advantages in reducing buccal bone loss compared to conventional implants, potentially due to their ability to mitigate risks to peri-implant tissues. Further research is warranted to evaluate their long-term efficacy and safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-282677
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abutment-free Tissue-Level Implants for Personalized Monolithic Zirconia Implant Crowns: A Retrospective Cohort Study

N Bayrich, A Dodi, R E Jung, M Marin et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Abutment-free Tissue-Level Implants for Personalized Monolithic Zirconia Implant Crowns: A Retrospective Cohort Study

N Bayrich, A Dodi, R E Jung, M Marin, P Fennema, A Ionescu, M I Nicolescu
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the peri-implant bone surrounding a new abutment free tissue-level implant design with classic tissue-level implants restored with titanium-base abutments. Results: No significant differences in patient demographics or complications were found between abutment-free and conventional implants. However, abutment-free implants exhibited less buccal bone loss than traditional implants. The abutment-free implant group had significantly lower buccal bone loss (p-values of 0.025 and 0.024 for oral palatal/lingual bone and alveolar ridge width, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that abutment-free dental implants offer advantages in reducing buccal bone loss compared to conventional implants, potentially due to their ability to mitigate risks to peri-implant tissues. Further research is warranted to evaluate their long-term efficacy and safety.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abutment-free Tissue-Level Implants for Personalized Monolithic Zirconia Implant Crowns: A Retrospective Cohort Study — N Bayrich, A Dodi, et al. · Universität Zürich, ZORA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS