Technology Takes Time: Review Article of Jeffrey Ding's <i>Technology and the Rise of Great Powers</i>   <i>by Josephine Wolff</i>

Abstract Many scholars have wrestled with the ways that technological innovation can fuel economic growth and result in shifts in political power and military conflict. These arguments have helped motivate a more recent literature looking at artificial intelligence (AI) that has, in many cases, emphasized the need for rapid development of AI technologies for fear of otherwise falling behind other countries and suffering significant economic and national security losses. Jeffrey Ding's Technology and the Rise of Great Powers argues that countries should not fall into the trap of thinking they are engaged in a short-term race to develop the best AI in the next few years because the economic impacts of new technologies arrive more slowly than we think and depend primarily on how well countries diffuse those technologies across their different industry sectors and develop pipelines for building relevant skills. In making this argument, Ding persuasively challenges not just common conceptions of the timeline for how long countries have to develop their AI industries but more broadly the idea that what matters most for capitalizing on the benefits of new technologies is the development or invention of the technology itself, rather than the slower, less glamorous work of implementing it in a variety of different industry settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Quarterly
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqaf156
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technology Takes Time: Review Article of Jeffrey Ding's Technology and the Rise of Great Powers   by Josephine Wolff

Josephine Wolff
Political Science Quarterly
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Technology Takes Time: Review Article of Jeffrey Ding's Technology and the Rise of Great Powers   by Josephine Wolff

Josephine Wolff
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many scholars have wrestled with the ways that technological innovation can fuel economic growth and result in shifts in political power and military conflict. These arguments have helped motivate a more recent literature looking at artificial intelligence (AI) that has, in many cases, emphasized the need for rapid development of AI technologies for fear of otherwise falling behind other countries and suffering significant economic and national security losses. Jeffrey Ding's Technology and the Rise of Great Powers argues that countries should not fall into the trap of thinking they are engaged in a short-term race to develop the best AI in the next few years because the economic impacts of new technologies arrive more slowly than we think and depend primarily on how well countries diffuse those technologies across their different industry sectors and develop pipelines for building relevant skills. In making this argument, Ding persuasively challenges not just common conceptions of the timeline for how long countries have to develop their AI industries but more broadly the idea that what matters most for capitalizing on the benefits of new technologies is the development or invention of the technology itself, rather than the slower, less glamorous work of implementing it in a variety of different industry settings.

Political Science Quarterly
Tufts University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.