Evaluating a Smoothie-Based Nutrition Education Program to Improve Nutrition Security in Rural Adolescents

<b>Background/Objective:</b> Nutrition security, defined as consistent access to and consumption of nutritious foods that support health, remains a persistent challenge in rural populations. The HEALTHY (Helping Early Adolescents Live Their Healthiest Youth) program aimed to improve rural adolescents' nutrition security through school-based strategies. This study evaluated its effectiveness by examining changes in fruit consumption, fruit waste, and skin carotenoid levels. <b>Methods:</b> A quasi-experimental, pre-post program was assessed in five rural middle schools (two experimental sites, three comparison sites). The programming paired four biweekly smoothie taste tests with nutrition education grounded in Social Cognitive Theory and Choice Architecture. Students in grades 3-8 (N = 149) participated. Digital tray photographs quantified selection and waste. The Veggie Meter<sup>®</sup> assessed skin carotenoids on a scale from 0 to 800. Surveys captured perceptions and self-reported intakes. Analyses included <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>, McNemar's, GLMM, paired <i>t</i>-tests, and ANCOVA. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.005. <b>Results:</b> At post-program, 98.3% of experimental trays contained the standard fruit option and/or a smoothie, compared with 41.0% of comparison trays (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 41.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Fruit selection odds were 16.22 times higher in experimental schools (95% CI: 6.30-41.77, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among trays with both (n = 39), smoothie waste was lower than the standard fruit option waste (<i>t</i>(38) = -7.10, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 1.14), resulting in greater estimated consumption (~0.43 vs. ~0.15 cups). Skin carotenoids increased in both groups, with greater improvement among experimental students in the lowest baseline quartile, <i>F</i> (1,19) = 9.20, <i>p</i> = 0.007, partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.326. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HEALTHY program, which paired frozen-fruit smoothies with nutrition education, may offer a feasible and scalable approach to improving nutrition security among rural adolescents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020305
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating a Smoothie-Based Nutrition Education Program to Improve Nutrition Security in Rural Adolescents

Emma Watras, Elizabeth Hufnagel, Kathleen Savoie, Bryn Kubinsky et al.
1 citations
Nutrients
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
41.85
article

Evaluating a Smoothie-Based Nutrition Education Program to Improve Nutrition Security in Rural Adolescents

Emma Watras, Elizabeth Hufnagel, Kathleen Savoie, Bryn Kubinsky, Kayla Gayer, Kathyrn Yerxa, Jade McNamara, Amelia Sullivan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective:</b> Nutrition security, defined as consistent access to and consumption of nutritious foods that support health, remains a persistent challenge in rural populations. The HEALTHY (Helping Early Adolescents Live Their Healthiest Youth) program aimed to improve rural adolescents' nutrition security through school-based strategies. This study evaluated its effectiveness by examining changes in fruit consumption, fruit waste, and skin carotenoid levels. <b>Methods:</b> A quasi-experimental, pre-post program was assessed in five rural middle schools (two experimental sites, three comparison sites). The programming paired four biweekly smoothie taste tests with nutrition education grounded in Social Cognitive Theory and Choice Architecture. Students in grades 3-8 (N = 149) participated. Digital tray photographs quantified selection and waste. The Veggie Meter<sup>®</sup> assessed skin carotenoids on a scale from 0 to 800. Surveys captured perceptions and self-reported intakes. Analyses included <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>, McNemar's, GLMM, paired <i>t</i>-tests, and ANCOVA. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.005. <b>Results:</b> At post-program, 98.3% of experimental trays contained the standard fruit option and/or a smoothie, compared with 41.0% of comparison trays (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 41.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Fruit selection odds were 16.22 times higher in experimental schools (95% CI: 6.30-41.77, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among trays with both (n = 39), smoothie waste was lower than the standard fruit option waste (<i>t</i>(38) = -7.10, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 1.14), resulting in greater estimated consumption (~0.43 vs. ~0.15 cups). Skin carotenoids increased in both groups, with greater improvement among experimental students in the lowest baseline quartile, <i>F</i> (1,19) = 9.20, <i>p</i> = 0.007, partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.326. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HEALTHY program, which paired frozen-fruit smoothies with nutrition education, may offer a feasible and scalable approach to improving nutrition security among rural adolescents.

NutrientsVol. 18(2)
University of Maine (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
41.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.