Feasibility and Sensitivity of Wearable Sensors for Daily Activity Monitoring in Spinal Cord Injury Trials

Background: The aim of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) is to improve everyday-life activity outcomes, which requires reliable methods for monitoring patient activity. This study evaluates sensor-derived activity metrics in comparison to established clinical assessment methods. Methods: Wearable inertial sensors collected data from 69 individuals with acute, traumatic cervical SCI participating in the Nogo-A Inhibition in Spinal Cord Injury trial (NCT03935321), a phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. During inpatient rehabilitation, participants wore up to 5 inertial sensors for up to 3 consecutive days each week. An estimation of average daily energy expenditure (EE) was used as an indicator of physical activity and compared to the recovery of Upper Extremity Motor Scores (UEMS) and Spinal Cord Independence Measures (SCIM). Results: Participants in the (n = 41; 59.4%) and placebo (n = 28; 40.6%) groups showed similar initial activity levels, however, the group exhibited a significantly greater weekly increase in average daily EE (ΔEE = 11.6 kcal/day/week, 95% CI [1.5, 21.8], = .025). In contrast, no significant group differences were observed in changes in UEMS (ΔUEMS = 0.1/week, 95% CI [-0.2, 0.3], = .603) or SCIM (ΔSCIM = 0.2, per week 95% CI [-0.7, 1.1], = .644). Conclusion: Continuous sensor-based activity monitoring offers objective and sensitive insights into changes in physical capabilities, effectively complementing periodic clinical assessments. Thus, sensor-derived outcome measures offer potential for improving the evaluation of clinical studies in individuals with SCI.Clinical Trail Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03935321.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-282769
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Sensitivity of Wearable Sensors for Daily Activity Monitoring in Spinal Cord Injury Trials

Norbert Weidner, Andreas Badke, Margret Hund‐Georgiadis, Anita D. Linke et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Feasibility and Sensitivity of Wearable Sensors for Daily Activity Monitoring in Spinal Cord Injury Trials

Norbert Weidner, Andreas Badke, Margret Hund‐Georgiadis, Anita D. Linke, Irina Lerch, Catherine R. Jutzeler, Jiří Kříž, Michael Baumberger, Doris Maier, Jesús Benito-Penalva, Rainer Abel, Melina Giagiozis, Josina Waldmann, Armin Curt, Rüdiger Rupp, László Demkó
article en

Abstract

Background: The aim of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) is to improve everyday-life activity outcomes, which requires reliable methods for monitoring patient activity. This study evaluates sensor-derived activity metrics in comparison to established clinical assessment methods. Methods: Wearable inertial sensors collected data from 69 individuals with acute, traumatic cervical SCI participating in the Nogo-A Inhibition in Spinal Cord Injury trial (NCT03935321), a phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. During inpatient rehabilitation, participants wore up to 5 inertial sensors for up to 3 consecutive days each week. An estimation of average daily energy expenditure (EE) was used as an indicator of physical activity and compared to the recovery of Upper Extremity Motor Scores (UEMS) and Spinal Cord Independence Measures (SCIM). Results: Participants in the (n = 41; 59.4%) and placebo (n = 28; 40.6%) groups showed similar initial activity levels, however, the group exhibited a significantly greater weekly increase in average daily EE (ΔEE = 11.6 kcal/day/week, 95% CI [1.5, 21.8], = .025). In contrast, no significant group differences were observed in changes in UEMS (ΔUEMS = 0.1/week, 95% CI [-0.2, 0.3], = .603) or SCIM (ΔSCIM = 0.2, per week 95% CI [-0.7, 1.1], = .644). Conclusion: Continuous sensor-based activity monitoring offers objective and sensitive insights into changes in physical capabilities, effectively complementing periodic clinical assessments. Thus, sensor-derived outcome measures offer potential for improving the evaluation of clinical studies in individuals with SCI.Clinical Trail Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03935321.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.