Platelet Aggregation Effect of Tirofiban Compared with Abciximab among Patients on Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review

Platelet aggregation plays a vital role in atherothrombosis and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications. In this systematic review, tirofiban and abciximab, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, were compared for efficacy and safety in PCI, based on five randomized trials and 539 participants, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Both drugs were effective and tolerable in most cases. Tirofiban had a reduced risk of thrombocytopenia and comparable rates of bleeding to abciximab. Intracoronary tirofiban has potential over intravenous administration, particularly in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, with better 30-day outcomes and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow, without an increased risk of bleeding. The choice of treatment should be based on the individual patient. Future clinical benefits should be substantiated by larger trials to provide guidance for best practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jccc_57_2025
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platelet Aggregation Effect of Tirofiban Compared with Abciximab among Patients on Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review

Paridhi Mathur, Bhavuk Jaiswal, Sandip Kumar Mitra, Atul Mathur et al.
Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Platelet Aggregation Effect of Tirofiban Compared with Abciximab among Patients on Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review

Paridhi Mathur, Bhavuk Jaiswal, Sandip Kumar Mitra, Atul Mathur, Rajat Singal
article en

Abstract

Platelet aggregation plays a vital role in atherothrombosis and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications. In this systematic review, tirofiban and abciximab, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, were compared for efficacy and safety in PCI, based on five randomized trials and 539 participants, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Both drugs were effective and tolerable in most cases. Tirofiban had a reduced risk of thrombocytopenia and comparable rates of bleeding to abciximab. Intracoronary tirofiban has potential over intravenous administration, particularly in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, with better 30-day outcomes and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow, without an increased risk of bleeding. The choice of treatment should be based on the individual patient. Future clinical benefits should be substantiated by larger trials to provide guidance for best practices.

Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSSVol. 10
Mankind Pharma (India) (IN), Fortis Escorts Heart Institute (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Platelet Aggregation Effect of Tirofiban Compared with Abciximab among Patients on Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review — Paridhi Mathur, Bhavuk Jaiswal, et al. · Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS