Equality Versus Equity in Multiple Measures: Gifted Identification Matrix Assessment Across Demographic Groups

The use of multiple criteria/modes for gifted identification is generally believed to improve the validity and reliability of measurements in several ways, including being more appropriate for identifying culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students. Many districts using multiple criteria/modes combine them in some fashion, including in the use of an identification matrix. However, the method for combining these measures itself can be psychometrically unsound and has been previously shown to influence which students are identified as gifted. This study explored measurement invariance of an in-use gifted identification matrix with 22,280 Kindergarten and fifth grade students to determine if the matrix performs equivalently across demographic/grade level groups. Although some matrix components performed similarly across various groups, no single component of the matrix functioned equivalently across all demographic/grade level groups. Patterns in the results are discussed, as well as recommendations for future use of identification matrices with diverse student populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Academics
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x251409562
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equality Versus Equity in Multiple Measures: Gifted Identification Matrix Assessment Across Demographic Groups

Robert A. Bartsch, Carol A. Carman, Christine A. P. Walther
Journal of Advanced Academics
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Equality Versus Equity in Multiple Measures: Gifted Identification Matrix Assessment Across Demographic Groups

Robert A. Bartsch, Carol A. Carman, Christine A. P. Walther
article en

Abstract

The use of multiple criteria/modes for gifted identification is generally believed to improve the validity and reliability of measurements in several ways, including being more appropriate for identifying culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students. Many districts using multiple criteria/modes combine them in some fashion, including in the use of an identification matrix. However, the method for combining these measures itself can be psychometrically unsound and has been previously shown to influence which students are identified as gifted. This study explored measurement invariance of an in-use gifted identification matrix with 22,280 Kindergarten and fifth grade students to determine if the matrix performs equivalently across demographic/grade level groups. Although some matrix components performed similarly across various groups, no single component of the matrix functioned equivalently across all demographic/grade level groups. Patterns in the results are discussed, as well as recommendations for future use of identification matrices with diverse student populations.

Journal of Advanced Academics
University of Houston - Clear Lake (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Equality Versus Equity in Multiple Measures: Gifted Identification Matrix Assessment Across Demographic Groups — Robert A. Bartsch, Carol A. Carman, et al. · Journal of Advanced Academics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS