Factors associated with the risk of fracture of mandibular overdentures on one or two implants: Findings from a 5-year follow-up

Purpose: This was a prospective study conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated the incidence of fractures and associated risk factors in single-implant overdentures (1-IOD) compared with two-implant overdentures (2-IOD). Methods: The participants received either a mandibular 1-IOD or 2-IOD (attachments: Straumann® retentive anchor and elliptical titanium matrix with gold insert; implants: 4.1 mm diameter, Straumann® Standard Plus SLActive® Regular Neck), within the context of a randomized clinical trial. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of IOD fractures at 5-year follow-up. Prosthetic factors, such as area and cervico-incisal height in the attachment region, and volume at the inter-canine region, were measured. Patient-related factors including age, sex, handgrip strength, manual dexterity, bite force, and chewing performance were assessed. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, bivariate tests, Kaplan-Meier plots, and linear discriminant analysis with log10 transformation for variable normalization. Results: A total of 47 patients were recruited, and 34 (n = 34, 1-IOD = 16, 2-IOD = 18; mean-age: 63.9 ± 8.6 years; 79.4% women) completed the 5-year follow-up. There were no differences in the incidence of fractures between the 1-IOD and 2-IOD groups (P < 0.05). Fractures were more frequent in younger patients, and reduced cervico-incisal IOD height was significantly associated with fractures (P = 0.040). Linear discriminant analysis predicted fractures with 84.4% accuracy and identified cervico-incisal height and age as key predictors. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the incidence of overdenture fractures between groups. Reduced cervico-incisal denture height in the attachment region of ball-retained IODs was associated with mandibular IOD fractures. Further studies with larger cohorts are recommended to identify additional risk factors for mandibular IODs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-282668
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors associated with the risk of fracture of mandibular overdentures on one or two implants: Findings from a 5-year follow-up

Nilva Oliveira Martins, Gerald McKenna, LUCAS PEIXOTO SILVA, C R Leles et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Factors associated with the risk of fracture of mandibular overdentures on one or two implants: Findings from a 5-year follow-up

Nilva Oliveira Martins, Gerald McKenna, LUCAS PEIXOTO SILVA, C R Leles, Lays Noleto Nascimento, Isabela Kattan Fontinele Azevedo, Murali Srinivasan
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This was a prospective study conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated the incidence of fractures and associated risk factors in single-implant overdentures (1-IOD) compared with two-implant overdentures (2-IOD). Methods: The participants received either a mandibular 1-IOD or 2-IOD (attachments: Straumann® retentive anchor and elliptical titanium matrix with gold insert; implants: 4.1 mm diameter, Straumann® Standard Plus SLActive® Regular Neck), within the context of a randomized clinical trial. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of IOD fractures at 5-year follow-up. Prosthetic factors, such as area and cervico-incisal height in the attachment region, and volume at the inter-canine region, were measured. Patient-related factors including age, sex, handgrip strength, manual dexterity, bite force, and chewing performance were assessed. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, bivariate tests, Kaplan-Meier plots, and linear discriminant analysis with log10 transformation for variable normalization. Results: A total of 47 patients were recruited, and 34 (n = 34, 1-IOD = 16, 2-IOD = 18; mean-age: 63.9 ± 8.6 years; 79.4% women) completed the 5-year follow-up. There were no differences in the incidence of fractures between the 1-IOD and 2-IOD groups (P < 0.05). Fractures were more frequent in younger patients, and reduced cervico-incisal IOD height was significantly associated with fractures (P = 0.040). Linear discriminant analysis predicted fractures with 84.4% accuracy and identified cervico-incisal height and age as key predictors. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the incidence of overdenture fractures between groups. Reduced cervico-incisal denture height in the attachment region of ball-retained IODs was associated with mandibular IOD fractures. Further studies with larger cohorts are recommended to identify additional risk factors for mandibular IODs.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.