Network separation modeling and quantum computing for developing wildfire fuelbreak strategy

Fuelbreak placement is an important consideration in fire management. Historically, strategies for placing fuelbreaks have fallen on the experience of fire managers such as by following ridgelines, and recent searches for a formal placement strategy have struggled to scale to large areas. Here we present a basic strategy utilizing equal graph partitioning and quantum computing to efficiently determine placements. By posing partitioning as a quadratic constrained binary optimization problem, D-Wave's hybrid quantum optimization tool could complete the task in seconds. Results for the examined area show two alternatives to the ridgeline method in a so-called worst-case fire scenario: one with 2.9% improvement in land separation equality while clearing 76 less acres, and another with a 12.4% improvement by clearing 19 more acres. In a selected subsection, D-Wave's hybrid solver performed faster than the SCIP solver but slower than the CPLEX solver, with the prospect for increased speed-up on larger problems. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of equal graph partitioning for fuelbreak placement and the potential of D-Wave's hybrid solvers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Engineering
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-026-00585-9
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network separation modeling and quantum computing for developing wildfire fuelbreak strategy

Kelsey Stoddard, Christopher L. Cummings, Madison Smith, Jeffrey C. Cegan et al.
Communications Engineering
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Network separation modeling and quantum computing for developing wildfire fuelbreak strategy

Kelsey Stoddard, Christopher L. Cummings, Madison Smith, Jeffrey C. Cegan, Andrew Strelzoff, Samuel Dent, Igor Linkov
article en

Abstract

Fuelbreak placement is an important consideration in fire management. Historically, strategies for placing fuelbreaks have fallen on the experience of fire managers such as by following ridgelines, and recent searches for a formal placement strategy have struggled to scale to large areas. Here we present a basic strategy utilizing equal graph partitioning and quantum computing to efficiently determine placements. By posing partitioning as a quadratic constrained binary optimization problem, D-Wave's hybrid quantum optimization tool could complete the task in seconds. Results for the examined area show two alternatives to the ridgeline method in a so-called worst-case fire scenario: one with 2.9% improvement in land separation equality while clearing 76 less acres, and another with a 12.4% improvement by clearing 19 more acres. In a selected subsection, D-Wave's hybrid solver performed faster than the SCIP solver but slower than the CPLEX solver, with the prospect for increased speed-up on larger problems. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of equal graph partitioning for fuelbreak placement and the potential of D-Wave's hybrid solvers.

Communications EngineeringVol. 5(1)
Westbrook University (US), Information Technology Laboratory (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Network separation modeling and quantum computing for developing wildfire fuelbreak strategy — Kelsey Stoddard, Christopher L. Cummings, et al. · Communications Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS