How Good Are Neurologists? A Diagnostic Accuracy Study on the Performance of Neurologists in the Emergency Room

Background In people with suspected stroke the first assessment occurs under time pressure in the emergency department and is based solely on clinical information. Working hypotheses include mechanism and localization of the clinical deficit on imaging. To assess the performance of neurologists in such situation, we investigated the accuracy with which board‐certified neurologists make the correct diagnosis based solely on clinical information. Methods In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study done at an emergency department of a university hospital, neurologists had to commit themselves to a diagnosis in people with suspected acute stroke. The main analysis was the accuracy with which they distinguished vascular from nonvascular causes using the discharge diagnosis as a reference. Secondary analyses included the distinction of ischemic from hemorrhagic strokes, and the accuracy with which the lesion location and site of vessel occlusion were identified. The performance of neurologists was also compared to residents and medical students. Results Of 800 people with suspected stroke, 567 (71%) had a vascular (508 ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and 59 hemorrhagic stroke) and 233 (29%) had a nonvascular disorder (72 seizures, 33 migraine auras, 12 functional neurological disorders, and 116 other diseases). Vessel occlusion was found in 227 of 410 people with ischemic stroke. Neurologists identified vascular origin with an accuracy of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.89), a sensitivity of 0.93 (0.90–0.95), and a specificity of 0.66 (0.58–0.73). The accuracy to identify ischemia compared with hemorrhage was 0.91 (0.87–0.93). Neurologists’ accuracy to predict the presence of vessel occlusion was 0.66 (0.61–0.71), of exact lesion location was 42%, and of the affected blood vessel 57%. Conclusion In people with acute neurological deficits, the accuracy with which neurologists identify vascular origin is high and depends on neurological education. Experienced physicians should be involved early in the management of people with “code stroke.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/93237
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Good Are Neurologists? A Diagnostic Accuracy Study on the Performance of Neurologists in the Emergency Room

Urs Fischer, Martina Goeldlin, Marwan El‐Koussy, Nebiyat F. Belachew et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

How Good Are Neurologists? A Diagnostic Accuracy Study on the Performance of Neurologists in the Emergency Room

Urs Fischer, Martina Goeldlin, Marwan El‐Koussy, Nebiyat F. Belachew, Aikaterini Galimanis, Thomas R. Meinel, Anne‐Sophie Eich, Mattia Branca, Adrian Scutelnic, Bianca‐Violeta Popa‐Todirenchi, Aristomenis Exadaktylos, Johannes Kaesmacher, Mirjam R. Heldner, Morin Beyeler, Christoph J. Schankin, Heinrich P. Mattle, Simon Jung
article en

Abstract

Background In people with suspected stroke the first assessment occurs under time pressure in the emergency department and is based solely on clinical information. Working hypotheses include mechanism and localization of the clinical deficit on imaging. To assess the performance of neurologists in such situation, we investigated the accuracy with which board‐certified neurologists make the correct diagnosis based solely on clinical information. Methods In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study done at an emergency department of a university hospital, neurologists had to commit themselves to a diagnosis in people with suspected acute stroke. The main analysis was the accuracy with which they distinguished vascular from nonvascular causes using the discharge diagnosis as a reference. Secondary analyses included the distinction of ischemic from hemorrhagic strokes, and the accuracy with which the lesion location and site of vessel occlusion were identified. The performance of neurologists was also compared to residents and medical students. Results Of 800 people with suspected stroke, 567 (71%) had a vascular (508 ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and 59 hemorrhagic stroke) and 233 (29%) had a nonvascular disorder (72 seizures, 33 migraine auras, 12 functional neurological disorders, and 116 other diseases). Vessel occlusion was found in 227 of 410 people with ischemic stroke. Neurologists identified vascular origin with an accuracy of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.89), a sensitivity of 0.93 (0.90–0.95), and a specificity of 0.66 (0.58–0.73). The accuracy to identify ischemia compared with hemorrhage was 0.91 (0.87–0.93). Neurologists’ accuracy to predict the presence of vessel occlusion was 0.66 (0.61–0.71), of exact lesion location was 42%, and of the affected blood vessel 57%. Conclusion In people with acute neurological deficits, the accuracy with which neurologists identify vascular origin is high and depends on neurological education. Experienced physicians should be involved early in the management of people with “code stroke.”

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
IST Research (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.