We-perspective on vision impairment: pathways between common dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction
Introduction Common DC, how couples cope together with stress, may protect couples from relationship dissatisfaction in the context of vision impairment. However, the mechanisms through which common DC relate to couple satisfaction are underexplored. This study aimed to examine whether we-ness, intimacy, and perceiving vision impairment as a we-disease mediate the relationship between common dyadic coping (DC) and relationship satisfaction in the context of vision impairment. Methods Ninety-nine individuals with visual impairment (IVI) and their spouses completed self-report questionnaires assessing DC, relationship satisfaction, intimacy, we-ness, and we-disease. An Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model was performed. Results Results showed that (1) higher levels of common DC were associated with higher intimacy and we-ness which, consequently, were associated with higher relationship satisfaction in both IVI and their spouses; and (2) the more IVI’ spouses engage in common DC, the more IVI perceived we-disease and, consequently, the less their spouses were satisfied with the relationship. Discussion Couples facing vision impairment benefited from conjoint coping efforts as they seem to strengthen their sense of togetherness and intimacy. The adaptiveness of dyadic appraisals for couples’ adjustment should be further explored in view of unexpected results. Psychosocial rehabilitation sessions should include both partners and promote conjoint coping strategies to address challenges associated with vision impairment.
Authors
- Katharina Weitkamp (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0233-9177)
- Christina J. Breitenstein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1312-1413)
- Stephanie Cristine Alves
- Guy Bodenmann
Publication Details
- Journal
- Universität Zürich, ZORA
- Published
- 2025-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-281502
- Primary Topic
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00