The Separate Grounds of Competence

When a person is competent, they can exercise their autonomy rights, including waiving claims against interference by giving consent. Non-competent persons, by contrast, lack these autonomy rights, which means that others are permitted to make certain decisions for them. What grounds this gulf between the rights of competent and non-competent persons? In this paper, we present a novel account of the capacities that underlie competence. Competence comprises two distinct rights: a power to alter claims and a claim against paternalistic interference with one’s decisions. While existing accounts appear to assume that the same capacities underlie both features of agential control, we argue that they have separate grounds. The capacity that grounds the power to alter claims is the capacity to value, whereas the capacity that grounds the claim against paternalistic interference is the more substantial capacity to be responsible for one’s actions. By separating these normative grounds, we solve a problem that plagues Common Grounds views. Our Separate Grounds account can explain why and in what way the decisions of persons with marginal autonomy should be respected without sacrificing the need to protect them from harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Free & Equal A Journal of Ethics and Public Affairs
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/fe.18623
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Separate Grounds of Competence

Joe Millum, Danielle Nicole Bromwich
Free & Equal A Journal of Ethics and Public Affairs
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
article

The Separate Grounds of Competence

Joe Millum, Danielle Nicole Bromwich
article en

Abstract

When a person is competent, they can exercise their autonomy rights, including waiving claims against interference by giving consent. Non-competent persons, by contrast, lack these autonomy rights, which means that others are permitted to make certain decisions for them. What grounds this gulf between the rights of competent and non-competent persons? In this paper, we present a novel account of the capacities that underlie competence. Competence comprises two distinct rights: a power to alter claims and a claim against paternalistic interference with one’s decisions. While existing accounts appear to assume that the same capacities underlie both features of agential control, we argue that they have separate grounds. The capacity that grounds the power to alter claims is the capacity to value, whereas the capacity that grounds the claim against paternalistic interference is the more substantial capacity to be responsible for one’s actions. By separating these normative grounds, we solve a problem that plagues Common Grounds views. Our Separate Grounds account can explain why and in what way the decisions of persons with marginal autonomy should be respected without sacrificing the need to protect them from harm.

Free & Equal A Journal of Ethics and Public AffairsVol. 2(1)
University of Leeds (GB), University of St Andrews (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.