A bad apple: The spillover effects of geopolitical risks on traditional energy trade

Geopolitical risks (GPRs) are reshaping global energy trade and influencing energy security in profound ways. This study examines how GPRs have impacted fossil fuel imports from 2000 to 2022. We find that rising GPRs not only reduce imports from high-risk nations but also lead to broader declines across other markets, revealing a spillover effect beyond simple market substitution. The effects vary significantly across energy types, with coal and oil imports being more sensitive to GPRs. Countries with abundant energy resources or political/military alliances are more resilient to GPR shocks. Additionally, nations with strong renewable energy potential are more likely to transition to renewables in response to GPRs, rather than relying on fossil fuel imports from other markets. This highlights the negative spillover effects of GPRs on global fossil fuel trade and offers new insights into their role in global energy dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2026.104909
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A bad apple: The spillover effects of geopolitical risks on traditional energy trade

Mingzhu Zhou, Enyu Zhao, Lili Wang, Zhenkun Cai
International Review of Economics & Finance
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

A bad apple: The spillover effects of geopolitical risks on traditional energy trade

Mingzhu Zhou, Enyu Zhao, Lili Wang, Zhenkun Cai
article en

Abstract

Geopolitical risks (GPRs) are reshaping global energy trade and influencing energy security in profound ways. This study examines how GPRs have impacted fossil fuel imports from 2000 to 2022. We find that rising GPRs not only reduce imports from high-risk nations but also lead to broader declines across other markets, revealing a spillover effect beyond simple market substitution. The effects vary significantly across energy types, with coal and oil imports being more sensitive to GPRs. Countries with abundant energy resources or political/military alliances are more resilient to GPR shocks. Additionally, nations with strong renewable energy potential are more likely to transition to renewables in response to GPRs, rather than relying on fossil fuel imports from other markets. This highlights the negative spillover effects of GPRs on global fossil fuel trade and offers new insights into their role in global energy dynamics.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 106
University of International Business and Economics (CN), Shandong University of Finance and Economics (CN), Renmin University of China (CN), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.