Vibrotactile feedback using exposure variation analysis to reduce musculoskeletal risk in surgical simulation
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are common in surgery due to sustained non-neutral postures. This study evaluated two wearable vibrotactile feedback methods designed to encourage real-time postural correction: one based on standard Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) thresholds, and another enhanced with Exposure Variation Analysis (EVA) to account for cumulative posture risk. Thirty participants completed a simulated surgical fine motor task under three conditions: control, RULA-based feedback, and EVA-based feedback. EVA-based feedback reduced time spent in high-risk RULA 5-6 postures by 91.5%, compared to 68.5% with RULA-based feedback when normalised by task duration. EVA-based feedback also required fewer cues on average (4.63 ± 2.13 vs. 10.37 ± 13.92). Both feedback methods significantly reduced mean RULA Category scores without increasing task time or cognitive workload. These findings support EVA-based feedback as a low-disruption, real-time ergonomic intervention that improves posture while minimising alert burden in precision-intensive environments.
Authors
- Bradley H. Strauss (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1139-2965)
- Samuel Brost
- Q. Li
- Cari Whyne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6822-8314)
- Alice Elizabeth Atkin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0549-3134)
- Sebastian Tomescu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0600-6626)
- William R. Bonin
- Denise Y. P. Henriques
Institutions
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- York University (CA)
- Queen's University (CA)
- Health Sciences Centre (CA)
- Sunnybrook Research Institute
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ergonomics
- Published
- 2026-01-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2026.2615116
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00