A world without violet: peculiar consequences of granting moral status to Artificial Intelligences

Abstract Granting artificial intelligences (AIs) moral status creates a set of ethical dilemmas stemming from our ability to control their preferences. As an illustrative example, if we could program an artificial system worthy of moral agency to experience suffering when encountering the color violet, then we appear to have created a scenario where we have a moral imperative to remove any violet objects from our surroundings. AIs in this situation can effectively “hijack” our moral landscape, altering the moral valence of arbitrary world states. In this work, we formalize the phenomenon of moral hijacking, analyze its implications from the perspective of several ethical systems, and propose recommendations for constraining novel preference creation in moral agents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02834-5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A world without violet: peculiar consequences of granting moral status to Artificial Intelligences

Sever Ioan Topan
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A world without violet: peculiar consequences of granting moral status to Artificial Intelligences

Sever Ioan Topan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Granting artificial intelligences (AIs) moral status creates a set of ethical dilemmas stemming from our ability to control their preferences. As an illustrative example, if we could program an artificial system worthy of moral agency to experience suffering when encountering the color violet, then we appear to have created a scenario where we have a moral imperative to remove any violet objects from our surroundings. AIs in this situation can effectively “hijack” our moral landscape, altering the moral valence of arbitrary world states. In this work, we formalize the phenomenon of moral hijacking, analyze its implications from the perspective of several ethical systems, and propose recommendations for constraining novel preference creation in moral agents.

AI & Society
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.