A criterion for assessing spatial resolution in digital image correlation: Applications to conventional, Gaussian-weighted, and deep learning-based methods

• A criterion based on double-step displacement analysis is proposed to assess the spatial resolution in digital image correlation. • For conventional DIC with a subset size of 2 M + 1 , the spatial resolutions are approximately 2 M + 2 and 0.66 ( 2 M + 1 ) for first- and second-order shape functions, respectively. • For Gaussian-weighted DIC with a weighting radius of R , the spatial resolutions are approximately 2 R and 1.53 R for first- and second-order shape functions, respectively. • The proposed criterion provides a general framework applicable to assess the spatial resolution of deep learning-based DIC methods. Accurate characterization of spatial resolution is essential for assessing the performance of digital image correlation (DIC) methods. Inspired by the classical Rayleigh criterion, this study considers a double-step displacement field and defines the spatial resolution as the separation at which two adjacent displacement discontinuities can just be resolved in the measured strain field. Based on this definition, theoretical models are developed to quantify the spatial resolution. For conventional DIC with a subset size of 2 M + 1 , the spatial resolution for the first-order shape function is approximately 2 M + 2 , while that for the second-order shape function is about 0.66 ( 2 M + 1 ) . For Gaussian-weighted DIC with a weighting radius of R , the spatial resolution is approximately 2 R for the first-order shape function and 1.53 R for the second-order shape function. The proposed criterion is further applied to deep learning-based DIC methods (e.g., U-DICNet, DICTr, and USDICNet) to demonstrate its universality. In summary, this work establishes a physically grounded and quantitatively reliable framework for evaluating spatial resolution in conventional, weighted, and learning-based DIC methods, with potential applications in performance assessment, algorithm optimization, and parameter selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2026.109631
Primary Topic
Optical measurement and interference techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A criterion for assessing spatial resolution in digital image correlation: Applications to conventional, Gaussian-weighted, and deep learning-based methods

Shihai Lan, Canyu Zhu, Guanyu Cheng, Zhichen Tang et al.
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
Optical measurement and interference techniques
article

A criterion for assessing spatial resolution in digital image correlation: Applications to conventional, Gaussian-weighted, and deep learning-based methods

Shihai Lan, Canyu Zhu, Guanyu Cheng, Zhichen Tang, Yong Su
article en

Abstract

• A criterion based on double-step displacement analysis is proposed to assess the spatial resolution in digital image correlation. • For conventional DIC with a subset size of 2 M + 1 , the spatial resolutions are approximately 2 M + 2 and 0.66 ( 2 M + 1 ) for first- and second-order shape functions, respectively. • For Gaussian-weighted DIC with a weighting radius of R , the spatial resolutions are approximately 2 R and 1.53 R for first- and second-order shape functions, respectively. • The proposed criterion provides a general framework applicable to assess the spatial resolution of deep learning-based DIC methods. Accurate characterization of spatial resolution is essential for assessing the performance of digital image correlation (DIC) methods. Inspired by the classical Rayleigh criterion, this study considers a double-step displacement field and defines the spatial resolution as the separation at which two adjacent displacement discontinuities can just be resolved in the measured strain field. Based on this definition, theoretical models are developed to quantify the spatial resolution. For conventional DIC with a subset size of 2 M + 1 , the spatial resolution for the first-order shape function is approximately 2 M + 2 , while that for the second-order shape function is about 0.66 ( 2 M + 1 ) . For Gaussian-weighted DIC with a weighting radius of R , the spatial resolution is approximately 2 R for the first-order shape function and 1.53 R for the second-order shape function. The proposed criterion is further applied to deep learning-based DIC methods (e.g., U-DICNet, DICTr, and USDICNet) to demonstrate its universality. In summary, this work establishes a physically grounded and quantitatively reliable framework for evaluating spatial resolution in conventional, weighted, and learning-based DIC methods, with potential applications in performance assessment, algorithm optimization, and parameter selection.

Optics and Lasers in EngineeringVol. 201
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Anhui Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Optical measurement and interference techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.