Porous polyethylene implant for skull base reconstruction in transsphenoidal surgery: a systematic literature review and institutional case series

Reconstruction of skull base (SB) defects following endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) is critical to minimize postoperative complications. Porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor®) implants have been employed for this purpose; however, their long-term complication rates and osteointegration outcomes remain unclear. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across three databases, including studies involving SB reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants that reported complications and osteointegration outcomes. Additionally, a retrospective analysis was performed on 94 patients undergoing SB reconstruction in transsphenoidal surgery with Medpor (2008–2024). Osteointegration was assessed via imaging and clinical outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, as well as intraoperative findings in reoperated cases. Eleven studies (691 patients) were included, with reported postoperative complications including CSF leaks (2.9%), infections (2.3%), and rare implant extrusion or osteointegration failures (0.4%). In the institutional cohort, 25 of 94 patients (26.6%) required reoperation, with 17 undergoing reoperation at least 6 months post-implantation. All these patients were reoperated for pathology recurrence, except for one who was reoperated for spontaneous Medpor extrusion. Among these, 94% (16/17) had no evidence of osteointegration. Chronic nasal symptoms were reported in 13.4% of non-reoperated patients, with no cases requiring implant removal. One of the 17 reoperated patient had an additional surgery due to spontaneous Medpor Extrusion. The placement of the nasoseptal flap to cover Medpor did not appear to have a facilitating effect on its osseointegration; however, its role will need to be further studied. Medpor implants demonstrate acceptable long-term safety for EEA skull base reconstruction, with low rates of major complications. However, osteointegration appears infrequent (< 8%) even over extended follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgical Review
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-04069-w
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Porous polyethylene implant for skull base reconstruction in transsphenoidal surgery: a systematic literature review and institutional case series

Sage Rahm, Pier Paolo Mattogno, Alberto Benato, Mario Rigante et al.
Neurosurgical Review
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
article

Porous polyethylene implant for skull base reconstruction in transsphenoidal surgery: a systematic literature review and institutional case series

Sage Rahm, Pier Paolo Mattogno, Alberto Benato, Mario Rigante, A. Olivi, Murad Sultanov, F. Doglietto, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Ludovico Agostini, Simona Serioli, Sabrina Chiloiro, Federico Valeri, Liverana Lauretti, Marco Galeazzi, Giorgia De Rosa, Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa
article en

Abstract

Reconstruction of skull base (SB) defects following endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) is critical to minimize postoperative complications. Porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor®) implants have been employed for this purpose; however, their long-term complication rates and osteointegration outcomes remain unclear. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across three databases, including studies involving SB reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants that reported complications and osteointegration outcomes. Additionally, a retrospective analysis was performed on 94 patients undergoing SB reconstruction in transsphenoidal surgery with Medpor (2008–2024). Osteointegration was assessed via imaging and clinical outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, as well as intraoperative findings in reoperated cases. Eleven studies (691 patients) were included, with reported postoperative complications including CSF leaks (2.9%), infections (2.3%), and rare implant extrusion or osteointegration failures (0.4%). In the institutional cohort, 25 of 94 patients (26.6%) required reoperation, with 17 undergoing reoperation at least 6 months post-implantation. All these patients were reoperated for pathology recurrence, except for one who was reoperated for spontaneous Medpor extrusion. Among these, 94% (16/17) had no evidence of osteointegration. Chronic nasal symptoms were reported in 13.4% of non-reoperated patients, with no cases requiring implant removal. One of the 17 reoperated patient had an additional surgery due to spontaneous Medpor Extrusion. The placement of the nasoseptal flap to cover Medpor did not appear to have a facilitating effect on its osseointegration; however, its role will need to be further studied. Medpor implants demonstrate acceptable long-term safety for EEA skull base reconstruction, with low rates of major complications. However, osteointegration appears infrequent (< 8%) even over extended follow-up.

Neurosurgical ReviewVol. 49(1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Cambia (AU), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.