Crisis, country, and party lines: politicians’ misinformation behavior and public engagement

Abstract Politicians with large media visibility and social media audiences have a significant influence on public discourse. Consequently, their dissemination of misinformation can have profound implications for society. This study investigated the misinformation-sharing behavior of 3277 politicians and associated public engagement by using data from X (formerly Twitter) during 2020–2021. The analysis was grounded in a novel and comprehensive dataset including over 400,000 tweets covering multiple levels of governance, including national executive, national legislative, and regional executive, in Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA, representing distinct clusters of misinformation resilience. Striking cross-country differences in misinformation-sharing behavior and public engagement were observed. Politicians from countries with a high level of political polarization and populist communication (i.e., Italy and the USA) exhibited the highest rates of misinformation sharing, primarily among far-right and conservative legislators. Public engagement with misinformation also varied significantly. In the USA, misinformation attracted over 2.5 times the engagement of reliable information. In Italy, although misinformation and reliable information received similar levels of engagement, crisis-related misinformation, particularly regarding COVID-19, surpassed general misinformation in both prevalence and audience engagement. These insights underscore the critical roles of political affiliation, governance level, and crisis contexts in shaping the dynamics of misinformation. The study expands the literature by providing a cross-national, multi-level perspective, shedding light on how political actors influence the proliferation of misinformation during crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Social Science
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-025-00447-y
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis, country, and party lines: politicians’ misinformation behavior and public engagement

Emese Domahidi, Fabiana Zollo, Jingyuan Yu, Duccio Gamannossi degl’Innocenti
Journal of Computational Social Science
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Crisis, country, and party lines: politicians’ misinformation behavior and public engagement

Emese Domahidi, Fabiana Zollo, Jingyuan Yu, Duccio Gamannossi degl’Innocenti
article en

Abstract

Abstract Politicians with large media visibility and social media audiences have a significant influence on public discourse. Consequently, their dissemination of misinformation can have profound implications for society. This study investigated the misinformation-sharing behavior of 3277 politicians and associated public engagement by using data from X (formerly Twitter) during 2020–2021. The analysis was grounded in a novel and comprehensive dataset including over 400,000 tweets covering multiple levels of governance, including national executive, national legislative, and regional executive, in Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA, representing distinct clusters of misinformation resilience. Striking cross-country differences in misinformation-sharing behavior and public engagement were observed. Politicians from countries with a high level of political polarization and populist communication (i.e., Italy and the USA) exhibited the highest rates of misinformation sharing, primarily among far-right and conservative legislators. Public engagement with misinformation also varied significantly. In the USA, misinformation attracted over 2.5 times the engagement of reliable information. In Italy, although misinformation and reliable information received similar levels of engagement, crisis-related misinformation, particularly regarding COVID-19, surpassed general misinformation in both prevalence and audience engagement. These insights underscore the critical roles of political affiliation, governance level, and crisis contexts in shaping the dynamics of misinformation. The study expands the literature by providing a cross-national, multi-level perspective, shedding light on how political actors influence the proliferation of misinformation during crisis.

Journal of Computational Social ScienceVol. 9(1)
Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE), University of Padua (IT), Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale La Chimica Per L'Ambiente (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.