"Talkin’ ‘Bout a Revolution": Considering Data-Driven Theorizing

Most of the quantitative work in management and organizational psychology emphasizes a deductive theory testing approach. In this paper, we focus on data-driven theorizing as an alternative, complementary approach to deduction. The increasing availability of (big) data and sophisticated methods provide opportunities for data-driven theory building and refinement as another way to build knowledge and advance the field. We explain how using data-driven theorizing in responsible and transparent ways can inform knowledge creation and theorizing, and we discuss opportunities and challenges. We also give recommendations for authors, reviewers, editors, and the discipline aimed at increasing transparency and stimulating responsible data-driven theorizing as well as increasing openness to the explorative use of quantitative data in our field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Psychology Review
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866251413766
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
63.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Talkin’ ‘Bout a Revolution": Considering Data-Driven Theorizing

Corine Boon, David G. Allen, Deanne N. Den Hartog
1 citations
Organizational Psychology Review
Management and Organizational Studies
63.80
article

"Talkin’ ‘Bout a Revolution": Considering Data-Driven Theorizing

Corine Boon, David G. Allen, Deanne N. Den Hartog
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Most of the quantitative work in management and organizational psychology emphasizes a deductive theory testing approach. In this paper, we focus on data-driven theorizing as an alternative, complementary approach to deduction. The increasing availability of (big) data and sophisticated methods provide opportunities for data-driven theory building and refinement as another way to build knowledge and advance the field. We explain how using data-driven theorizing in responsible and transparent ways can inform knowledge creation and theorizing, and we discuss opportunities and challenges. We also give recommendations for authors, reviewers, editors, and the discipline aimed at increasing transparency and stimulating responsible data-driven theorizing as well as increasing openness to the explorative use of quantitative data in our field.

Organizational Psychology ReviewVol. 16(1)
Texas Christian University (US), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Management and Organizational Studies
63.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

"Talkin’ ‘Bout a Revolution": Considering Data-Driven Theorizing — Corine Boon, David G. Allen, et al. · Organizational Psychology Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS