When negative feedback becomes self-undermining: instrument termination in environmental regulation

Abstract Termination of public policy is a notoriously challenging research topic. Our study focuses on how policy feedback dynamics can potentially result in termination. The concept of policy feedback has mainly been applied to explain policy continuity. Recent scholarly advancements have directed attention to negative and self-undermining feedback, offering nuanced insights into feedback dynamics and their impact on policy evolution. This perspective has potential to enrich our understanding of policy termination processes. Utilizing the concepts of mixed and self-undermining feedback, this analysis demonstrates how a specific policy instrument may be discontinued due to accumulation of negative feedback that may eventually become self-undermining when a viable alternative instrument emerges on the policy menu. The case of Danish nitrogen pollution regulation illustrates this phenomenon in which the primary instrument—a nitrogen application cap—was terminated as the major regulatory instrument due to negative feedback becoming self-undermining.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy and Society
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf050
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When negative feedback becomes self-undermining: instrument termination in environmental regulation

Giulia Bazzan, Carsten Daugbjerg
2 citations
Policy and Society
Policy Transfer and Learning
17.04
article

When negative feedback becomes self-undermining: instrument termination in environmental regulation

Giulia Bazzan, Carsten Daugbjerg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Termination of public policy is a notoriously challenging research topic. Our study focuses on how policy feedback dynamics can potentially result in termination. The concept of policy feedback has mainly been applied to explain policy continuity. Recent scholarly advancements have directed attention to negative and self-undermining feedback, offering nuanced insights into feedback dynamics and their impact on policy evolution. This perspective has potential to enrich our understanding of policy termination processes. Utilizing the concepts of mixed and self-undermining feedback, this analysis demonstrates how a specific policy instrument may be discontinued due to accumulation of negative feedback that may eventually become self-undermining when a viable alternative instrument emerges on the policy menu. The case of Danish nitrogen pollution regulation illustrates this phenomenon in which the primary instrument—a nitrogen application cap—was terminated as the major regulatory instrument due to negative feedback becoming self-undermining.

Policy and SocietyVol. 45(2)
Australian National University (AU), University of Copenhagen (DK), Tilburg University (NL), Crawford University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Policy Transfer and Learning
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When negative feedback becomes self-undermining: instrument termination in environmental regulation — Giulia Bazzan, Carsten Daugbjerg · Policy and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS