Reliability and validity of the steep ramp test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness in apparently healthy adults

To investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of the steep ramp test (SRT), a short and practical maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer, for assessing CRF in apparently healthy adults aged 25–85 years. To determine test-retest reliability, the reliability group performed the SRT twice within 2–14 days. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the attained work rate at peak exercise (WRpeak) at the SRT was calculated and agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated. To determine criterion and construct validity of the SRT, the validity group performed both the SRT and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a single day. Correlation analyses were used to assess the relationship between SRT WRpeak and oxygen uptake (V̇O2) at peak exercise (V̇O2peak), V̇O2 at the first ventilatory threshold (V̇O2VT1), and the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) achieved during CPET. In the reliability group (n = 66, 35 males), the ICC for SRT WRpeak was 0.992. Limits of agreement ranged from − 18.6 W (-5.4%) to 24.1 W (6.5%). The SDC was 15 W, 0.2 W/kg, or 4.2%. In the validity group (n = 61, 33 males), CPET V̇O2peak, V̇O2VT1, and OUES showed Pearson’s correlation coefficients with SRT WRpeak of 0.936, 0.806, and 0.891, respectively. The following equation predicts V̇O2peak (mL/min) from SRT performance: -280.784 + (8.680 × SRT WRpeak (in W)) (adjusted R2 = 0.874, SEE = 318.476). This study demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability, very high criterion validity, and high construct validity of the SRT for assessing CRF in apparently healthy adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-06071-y
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and validity of the steep ramp test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness in apparently healthy adults

Nieuwenhuis Mg, Tim I.M. Takken, Anuschka S. Niemeijer, Darcy Ummels et al.
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Reliability and validity of the steep ramp test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness in apparently healthy adults

Nieuwenhuis Mg, Tim I.M. Takken, Anuschka S. Niemeijer, Darcy Ummels, Caspar Mylius, Moniek Akkerman, Ingeborg A Trul-Kreuze, Han Houdijk, Bart C Bongers
article en

Abstract

To investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of the steep ramp test (SRT), a short and practical maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer, for assessing CRF in apparently healthy adults aged 25–85 years. To determine test-retest reliability, the reliability group performed the SRT twice within 2–14 days. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the attained work rate at peak exercise (WRpeak) at the SRT was calculated and agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated. To determine criterion and construct validity of the SRT, the validity group performed both the SRT and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a single day. Correlation analyses were used to assess the relationship between SRT WRpeak and oxygen uptake (V̇O2) at peak exercise (V̇O2peak), V̇O2 at the first ventilatory threshold (V̇O2VT1), and the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) achieved during CPET. In the reliability group (n = 66, 35 males), the ICC for SRT WRpeak was 0.992. Limits of agreement ranged from − 18.6 W (-5.4%) to 24.1 W (6.5%). The SDC was 15 W, 0.2 W/kg, or 4.2%. In the validity group (n = 61, 33 males), CPET V̇O2peak, V̇O2VT1, and OUES showed Pearson’s correlation coefficients with SRT WRpeak of 0.936, 0.806, and 0.891, respectively. The following equation predicts V̇O2peak (mL/min) from SRT performance: -280.784 + (8.680 × SRT WRpeak (in W)) (adjusted R2 = 0.874, SEE = 318.476). This study demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability, very high criterion validity, and high construct validity of the SRT for assessing CRF in apparently healthy adults.

European Journal of Applied Physiology
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Hanze University of Applied Sciences (NL), Zuyd University of Applied Sciences (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Martini Ziekenhuis (NL), Association of Dutch Burn Centres (NL), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (NL)
Hanzehogeschool Groningen, Zuyd Hogeschool
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.