Intraoperative Intracochlear ECochG and hearing preservation early after cochlear implantation – A meta-analysis

Aim: There are a range of approaches to intraoperative ECochG monitoring across different implant systems, and these show inconsistent results. Here we synthesize by meta-analysis the evidence for real-time intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) recorded during cochlear implantation predicting residual hearing. Methods: Inclusion criteria included original studies in which real-time ECochG was undertaken on a commercial cochlear implant (CI) and residual hearing outcomes at least 4 weeks after implantation were reported. Thirteen studies comprising 313 individual patient data sets met inclusion criteria. Full data sets were sought from the authors. Studies were rated for quality and bias. Details about study design (observational or interventional) and electrode characteristics (lateral wall or perimodiolar) were extracted. Relative hearing loss across the low frequencies (250-1000 Hz) was the main outcome, with decibel loss and functional hearing as secondary outcomes. Effects were explored by forest plot, and then linear mixed modelling on the full data sets. Sensitivity analyses included recalculation of hearing preservation using thresholds across different frequencies. Results: Thirteen studies, including 313 full patient data sets, were included, and meta-analysis was performed on lateral wall electrodes. A drop of ECochG amplitude of >30%, even if transient, predicted residual hearing across all metrics (decibel, relative and functional), and data-synthesis methods (forest plots and linear modelling) for all systems where real-time measurements were available. A drop of amplitude of at least 60% across insertion predicted relative but not decibel hearing loss in linear mixed modelling. The “pattern” of ECochG drop, as described by Harris in 2017, did not predict residual hearing by any method. Discussion: The only truly “real-time” measurement that predicted residual hearing was an instantaneous drop in ECochG amplitude, with or without recovery. Large drops over the insertion did too, but these can only be calculated after insertion, and after the cochlear trauma has been done. All CI systems now offer real-time monitoring – these results provide guidance on how best to use it to optimise clinical outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-282077
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraoperative Intracochlear ECochG and hearing preservation early after cochlear implantation – A meta-analysis

Christofer William Bester, William Graham Shute, Aaron M. Collins, Fatima Moumen Denanto et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Intraoperative Intracochlear ECochG and hearing preservation early after cochlear implantation – A meta-analysis

Christofer William Bester, William Graham Shute, Aaron M. Collins, Fatima Moumen Denanto, Adrian Dalbert, Stephen O'Leary, Orit Samuel
article en

Abstract

Aim: There are a range of approaches to intraoperative ECochG monitoring across different implant systems, and these show inconsistent results. Here we synthesize by meta-analysis the evidence for real-time intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) recorded during cochlear implantation predicting residual hearing. Methods: Inclusion criteria included original studies in which real-time ECochG was undertaken on a commercial cochlear implant (CI) and residual hearing outcomes at least 4 weeks after implantation were reported. Thirteen studies comprising 313 individual patient data sets met inclusion criteria. Full data sets were sought from the authors. Studies were rated for quality and bias. Details about study design (observational or interventional) and electrode characteristics (lateral wall or perimodiolar) were extracted. Relative hearing loss across the low frequencies (250-1000 Hz) was the main outcome, with decibel loss and functional hearing as secondary outcomes. Effects were explored by forest plot, and then linear mixed modelling on the full data sets. Sensitivity analyses included recalculation of hearing preservation using thresholds across different frequencies. Results: Thirteen studies, including 313 full patient data sets, were included, and meta-analysis was performed on lateral wall electrodes. A drop of ECochG amplitude of >30%, even if transient, predicted residual hearing across all metrics (decibel, relative and functional), and data-synthesis methods (forest plots and linear modelling) for all systems where real-time measurements were available. A drop of amplitude of at least 60% across insertion predicted relative but not decibel hearing loss in linear mixed modelling. The “pattern” of ECochG drop, as described by Harris in 2017, did not predict residual hearing by any method. Discussion: The only truly “real-time” measurement that predicted residual hearing was an instantaneous drop in ECochG amplitude, with or without recovery. Large drops over the insertion did too, but these can only be calculated after insertion, and after the cochlear trauma has been done. All CI systems now offer real-time monitoring – these results provide guidance on how best to use it to optimise clinical outcomes.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.