Percutaneous coronary intervention plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) versus GDMT alone in adults with stable coronary artery disease
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the clinical benefits and harms of percutaneous coronary intervention plus guideline-directed medical therapy compared with guideline-directed medical therapy alone for stable coronary artery disease in adults.
Authors
- Irshad Ali Bajeer
- José Miguel Palacios (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-2809)
- Iván Pérez‐Neri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0190-7272)
- Gabriella Comunián-Carrasco
- Diana Monge Martín
- Bhone Myint Kyaw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1750-0330)
- Cristina Elena Martí-Amarista (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-1450)
- Mark Dayer
- Mario A Gemmato-Valecillos
- Arturo J Martí-Carvajal
- Raquel Esther Gonzalez Hormostay
- Gursimer Jeet
- Fernando-María Caballero -Martínez
- Mona Abdalla
- Ricardo Riera Lizardo
Institutions
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado (VE)
- Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (ES)
- Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (PK)
- Madrid Health Service (ES)
- Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación (MX)
- Mater Private Hospital (AU)
- Elmhurst Hospital Center (US)
- Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social (PY)
- Comunidad de Madrid (ES)
- Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SG)
- Jewish Home (US)
- Oldham Council (GB)
- IMU University (MY)
- Universidad de Carabobo (VE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Published
- 2026-01-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd016213
- Primary Topic
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00