From the Courtroom to the Classroom: Enhancing L2 Learners’ Argumentative Skills Through a Mock Trial Simulation

Background Simulation tasks have become an increasingly popular pedagogical tool across various educational contexts, since they replicate real-world scenarios that foster active learning. Simulations encourage students to apply theoretical knowledge, make decisions, and develop skills that are directly transferable to academic and professional settings. In second language education, simulations are particularly valuable for developing higher-order skills, such as critical thinking, communication, and argumentation. Aim This study investigated whether a mock trial simulation contributes to the enhancement of argumentative skills among advanced L2 learners. Method The simulation, conducted in the context of an advanced language development course, provided student teachers with a platform to practice constructing, presenting, and defending arguments. Nineteen students participated, using The Handmaid’s Tale as the basis for their legal case. Data were gathered through a post-simulation questionnaire, which included both quantitative and qualitative components. Results The quantitative results indicated significant improvements in students’ use of evidence, logical reasoning, and ability to respond to counterarguments. Qualitative feedback revealed that students desired clearer guidelines, more preparation time, and more balanced participation. Conclusion Overall, the findings highlighted the value of simulation tasks as effective pedagogical tools that foster critical thinking, language proficiency, and argumentation skills. While the mock trial yielded positive outcomes, future studies should explore the use of such simulations with different populations and in varied educational contexts to further refine and extend this pedagogical tool. The study demonstrated the potential of simulations like mock trials as innovative methods for advancing both linguistic and cognitive skills in language learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Simulation & Gaming
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781261416273
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the Courtroom to the Classroom: Enhancing L2 Learners’ Argumentative Skills Through a Mock Trial Simulation

Karen Lorraine Cresci, Pedro Luis Luchini
Simulation & Gaming
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
article

From the Courtroom to the Classroom: Enhancing L2 Learners’ Argumentative Skills Through a Mock Trial Simulation

Karen Lorraine Cresci, Pedro Luis Luchini
article en

Abstract

Background Simulation tasks have become an increasingly popular pedagogical tool across various educational contexts, since they replicate real-world scenarios that foster active learning. Simulations encourage students to apply theoretical knowledge, make decisions, and develop skills that are directly transferable to academic and professional settings. In second language education, simulations are particularly valuable for developing higher-order skills, such as critical thinking, communication, and argumentation. Aim This study investigated whether a mock trial simulation contributes to the enhancement of argumentative skills among advanced L2 learners. Method The simulation, conducted in the context of an advanced language development course, provided student teachers with a platform to practice constructing, presenting, and defending arguments. Nineteen students participated, using The Handmaid’s Tale as the basis for their legal case. Data were gathered through a post-simulation questionnaire, which included both quantitative and qualitative components. Results The quantitative results indicated significant improvements in students’ use of evidence, logical reasoning, and ability to respond to counterarguments. Qualitative feedback revealed that students desired clearer guidelines, more preparation time, and more balanced participation. Conclusion Overall, the findings highlighted the value of simulation tasks as effective pedagogical tools that foster critical thinking, language proficiency, and argumentation skills. While the mock trial yielded positive outcomes, future studies should explore the use of such simulations with different populations and in varied educational contexts to further refine and extend this pedagogical tool. The study demonstrated the potential of simulations like mock trials as innovative methods for advancing both linguistic and cognitive skills in language learning environments.

Simulation & Gaming
National University of Mar del Plata (AR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From the Courtroom to the Classroom: Enhancing L2 Learners’ Argumentative Skills Through a Mock Trial Simulation — Karen Lorraine Cresci, Pedro Luis Luchini · Simulation & Gaming (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS