COLLABORATIVE DYSPHAGIA CARE BY SWALLOWING THERAPISTS AND NURSES: IMPACT ON ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA, NUTRITION, AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES; A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Abstract Background: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common after stroke and critical illness and is strongly associated with aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, delayed medication delivery, and prolonged hospitalization. In real-world care pathways, nurses often perform early screening and daily feeding-safety tasks, while swallowing therapists provide formal assessment and targeted therapy. The clinical impact of structured collaboration between these groups across settings remains variably reported. Objectives: To synthesize evidence from original studies describing collaborative dysphagia care models involving nurses and swallowing therapists and their associations with aspiration pneumonia, nutrition, oral intake, and other clinical outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA-aligned methods. We searched PubMed Central (PMC) for original studies describing dysphagia screening, management programs that explicitly integrated nursing actions with swallowing therapist assessment or therapy. Outcomes of interest included aspiration pneumonia, oral intake, nutrition measures, mortality, length of stay, and process outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I domains for non-randomized designs. Results: Ten original studies were included: one large registry analysis, multiple before–after, quality-improvement implementations, one randomized controlled trial, and additional observational studies. Across ICU and stroke pathways, nurse-led screening linked to therapist referral was associated with higher rates of oral feeding and lower pneumonia risk in adjusted analyses. Oral care protocols delivered by trained nurses as part of dysphagia management reduced aspiration pneumonia. Early swallowing therapy initiation after stroke improved recovery and reduced pneumonia. Evidence was limited by heterogeneity, frequent non-randomized designs, and incomplete reporting of nutrition endpoints. Conclusions: Collaborative nurse–therapist dysphagia care, particularly early screening, prompt therapist involvement, oral care, and early therapy, was consistently associated with improved pneumonia-related and oral intake outcomes, but stronger multicenter trials with standardized nutrition outcomes are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18298878
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COLLABORATIVE DYSPHAGIA CARE BY SWALLOWING THERAPISTS AND NURSES: IMPACT ON ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA, NUTRITION, AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES; A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Yousef Mohammed Alghamdi, ABDULLAH ALI ALGHUTHAYMI, NOUF SALEH ALMULAIK, NAWAF ABDULKARIM ALNAAM et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

COLLABORATIVE DYSPHAGIA CARE BY SWALLOWING THERAPISTS AND NURSES: IMPACT ON ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA, NUTRITION, AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES; A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Yousef Mohammed Alghamdi, ABDULLAH ALI ALGHUTHAYMI, NOUF SALEH ALMULAIK, NAWAF ABDULKARIM ALNAAM, NORA AHMED ALTORBAK, EBTEHAL FAHAD ALARFAJ, AFNAN DHIAFALLAH ALOTAIBI, EBTEHAL ABDULLAH ALNUZHAH, NAJLA ABDULLAH ALKATHIRI
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common after stroke and critical illness and is strongly associated with aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, delayed medication delivery, and prolonged hospitalization. In real-world care pathways, nurses often perform early screening and daily feeding-safety tasks, while swallowing therapists provide formal assessment and targeted therapy. The clinical impact of structured collaboration between these groups across settings remains variably reported. Objectives: To synthesize evidence from original studies describing collaborative dysphagia care models involving nurses and swallowing therapists and their associations with aspiration pneumonia, nutrition, oral intake, and other clinical outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA-aligned methods. We searched PubMed Central (PMC) for original studies describing dysphagia screening, management programs that explicitly integrated nursing actions with swallowing therapist assessment or therapy. Outcomes of interest included aspiration pneumonia, oral intake, nutrition measures, mortality, length of stay, and process outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I domains for non-randomized designs. Results: Ten original studies were included: one large registry analysis, multiple before–after, quality-improvement implementations, one randomized controlled trial, and additional observational studies. Across ICU and stroke pathways, nurse-led screening linked to therapist referral was associated with higher rates of oral feeding and lower pneumonia risk in adjusted analyses. Oral care protocols delivered by trained nurses as part of dysphagia management reduced aspiration pneumonia. Early swallowing therapy initiation after stroke improved recovery and reduced pneumonia. Evidence was limited by heterogeneity, frequent non-randomized designs, and incomplete reporting of nutrition endpoints. Conclusions: Collaborative nurse–therapist dysphagia care, particularly early screening, prompt therapist involvement, oral care, and early therapy, was consistently associated with improved pneumonia-related and oral intake outcomes, but stronger multicenter trials with standardized nutrition outcomes are needed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Maternity and Children's Hospital (SA), Swallow Solutions (United States) (US), National Guard Military Academy of Ukraine (UA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.