Promoting and protecting mental health of people living with adventitious blindness and low vision: A scoping review of protective and risk factors

Introduction: People living with visual impairment (VI) have a higher prevalence of mental health challenges versus those without VI. The occurrence of clinical depression has been estimated at 10% to 40% among this population. Specifically, adults of working age (18-65 years) living with adventitious VI have a higher risk of severe psychological distress, disruption of employment status and attendant loss of income. Hence, our overall research question was: What is known from existing literature about the protective and risk factors for mental health of working age adults (18-65 years) with adventitious total bilateral blindness and low vision? Methods: Using Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, articles in English were systematically searched across six databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycArticles, Web of Science. Searches were also conducted in various websites such as: World Blind Union, World Vision, African Union, and Royal National Institute of Blind People. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Full texts were then reviewed by the team. Of 4,352 identified titles, 92 were included. We thematically analysed the evidence using inductive and deductive approaches with the latter informed by Dahlgren and Whitehead’s socioecological model. Results: Thirteen (13) risk and 10 protective themes were identified. Rehabilitation (protective) was the commonest theme in 30.4% of studies, followed by negative social support (risk) at 17.4%. Most research was conducted in the US (43.5%). Critical findings included: strong socially determined nature of mental health; coexistence of positive and negative social support and limited studies of lived experience. Our analysis also revealed layers of under and mis-representation; these included scarce research from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), non-uniformity in definitions of blindness and incomplete reporting of participant characteristics. Conclusion: This is the first scoping review to comprehensively explore protective and risk factors for mental health for people living with adventitious total bilateral blindness and low vision. This study reports multiple upstream drivers acting singularly and in concert to exert a profound determining influence on the mental health of our target population. It also highlights the institutional ways that the condition and related issues are reported, recorded and researched.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of community systems for health /
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36368/jcsh.v2i1.1213
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting and protecting mental health of people living with adventitious blindness and low vision: A scoping review of protective and risk factors

Bernadine N. Ekpenyong, Lucia D’Ambruoso, Heather Morgan, Zoë Skea et al.
Journal of community systems for health /
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Promoting and protecting mental health of people living with adventitious blindness and low vision: A scoping review of protective and risk factors

Bernadine N. Ekpenyong, Lucia D’Ambruoso, Heather Morgan, Zoë Skea, Nneoma Dike, Mukhtar Muhammad-Aji
article en

Abstract

Introduction: People living with visual impairment (VI) have a higher prevalence of mental health challenges versus those without VI. The occurrence of clinical depression has been estimated at 10% to 40% among this population. Specifically, adults of working age (18-65 years) living with adventitious VI have a higher risk of severe psychological distress, disruption of employment status and attendant loss of income. Hence, our overall research question was: What is known from existing literature about the protective and risk factors for mental health of working age adults (18-65 years) with adventitious total bilateral blindness and low vision? Methods: Using Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, articles in English were systematically searched across six databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycArticles, Web of Science. Searches were also conducted in various websites such as: World Blind Union, World Vision, African Union, and Royal National Institute of Blind People. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Full texts were then reviewed by the team. Of 4,352 identified titles, 92 were included. We thematically analysed the evidence using inductive and deductive approaches with the latter informed by Dahlgren and Whitehead’s socioecological model. Results: Thirteen (13) risk and 10 protective themes were identified. Rehabilitation (protective) was the commonest theme in 30.4% of studies, followed by negative social support (risk) at 17.4%. Most research was conducted in the US (43.5%). Critical findings included: strong socially determined nature of mental health; coexistence of positive and negative social support and limited studies of lived experience. Our analysis also revealed layers of under and mis-representation; these included scarce research from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), non-uniformity in definitions of blindness and incomplete reporting of participant characteristics. Conclusion: This is the first scoping review to comprehensively explore protective and risk factors for mental health for people living with adventitious total bilateral blindness and low vision. This study reports multiple upstream drivers acting singularly and in concert to exert a profound determining influence on the mental health of our target population. It also highlights the institutional ways that the condition and related issues are reported, recorded and researched.

Journal of community systems for health /Vol. 2(1)
Western Cape Department of Health (ZA), University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Calabar (NG), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Rivers State University (NG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.