Rolling Walk-Forward LSTM for Daily Stock-Return Prediction in European Defence Markets

Abstract We study daily stock-return prediction in European defence equities using a rolling, walk-forward LSTM evaluated under strict time ordering. The model forecasts next-day log returns for Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) and BAE Systems (BA.L) over 2020–2025 from stationary, returns-based features (multi-horizon returns; 5/20/60-day volatility; high–low range; volume change and volume/20-day mean; centered RSI; normalized MACD; 5/20-day momentum). At each refit we use a 3-year rolling window, a 60-day lookback, z-score features on the train fold only, Huber loss with Adam (5e-4), dropout 0.2, early stopping, and no shuffling. We convert forecasts into trades with a single entry threshold (τ) calibrated once on the first half of the out-of-sample (OOS) period to maximize Sharpe under turnover-based 10 bps round-trip costs, then held fixed on the second half. On the post-calibration test half, Rheinmetall achieves ~100.6% total return with Sharpe 2.24, exceeding same-dates buy-and-hold (~95.7%, Sharpe 1.76). For BAE Systems, results are marginal relative to buyand-hold (LSTM ~22.5%, Sharpe ~1.05 vs ~37.5%, Sharpe ~0.94). The findings show that a small, transparent LSTM combined with a calibration-then-test design and realistic transaction-cost accounting can yield tradable signals for some assets while highlighting asset-dependence of predictability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Business and Economics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2025-0053
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rolling Walk-Forward LSTM for Daily Stock-Return Prediction in European Defence Markets

Cezar Cătălin Ene, Cristi Spulbăr
Studies in Business and Economics
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Rolling Walk-Forward LSTM for Daily Stock-Return Prediction in European Defence Markets

Cezar Cătălin Ene, Cristi Spulbăr
article en

Abstract

Abstract We study daily stock-return prediction in European defence equities using a rolling, walk-forward LSTM evaluated under strict time ordering. The model forecasts next-day log returns for Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) and BAE Systems (BA.L) over 2020–2025 from stationary, returns-based features (multi-horizon returns; 5/20/60-day volatility; high–low range; volume change and volume/20-day mean; centered RSI; normalized MACD; 5/20-day momentum). At each refit we use a 3-year rolling window, a 60-day lookback, z-score features on the train fold only, Huber loss with Adam (5e-4), dropout 0.2, early stopping, and no shuffling. We convert forecasts into trades with a single entry threshold (τ) calibrated once on the first half of the out-of-sample (OOS) period to maximize Sharpe under turnover-based 10 bps round-trip costs, then held fixed on the second half. On the post-calibration test half, Rheinmetall achieves ~100.6% total return with Sharpe 2.24, exceeding same-dates buy-and-hold (~95.7%, Sharpe 1.76). For BAE Systems, results are marginal relative to buyand-hold (LSTM ~22.5%, Sharpe ~1.05 vs ~37.5%, Sharpe ~0.94). The findings show that a small, transparent LSTM combined with a calibration-then-test design and realistic transaction-cost accounting can yield tradable signals for some assets while highlighting asset-dependence of predictability.

Studies in Business and EconomicsVol. 20(3)
University of Craiova (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.