Is it worse than death? Appraisal of health states among older adults and their relatives in Switzerland

Objective: Our objective was to study health state appraisals in healthy older Swiss with a focus on health deficits typically associated with dementia. We also aimed to elucidate the congruency of self-ratings of health states with proxy-ratings by possible future surrogate decision-makers. Methods: This is a single-center, cross-sectional survey among a convenience sample of pairs of healthy older adults and their possible future surrogate decision-makers. Following a States Worse Than Death (SWD) approach, participants were asked to appraise health deficit states in relation to death both for themselves and for their dyadic partners. Results: The final sample consisted of 248 participants, i.e. 124 pairs of healthy older adults (62.1% male; mean age: 71.6ys (SD: 10.5ys)) and their possible future surrogate decisionmakers (mostly spouses or children). Of the 17 health states included in the survey, eleven were rated as equal or worse than death by more than half of healthy older adults. Similarly, ten health states were rated as equal or worse than death by more than half of possible future surrogate decision-makers. Overall, there was good - and higher than random - congruency between ratings of dyadic partners. Discussion: Participants of our study preferred death over living with various types of health impairments to a striking extent, particularly those associated with dementia. There was a good consistency of health state appraisals between dyadic partners which could translate into consistent decision-making - in case proxy decision-making were to become necessary. The use of patient-centered health measures such as SWD approaches may aid goals-of-care discussions, facilitate end-of-life communications and thus improve healthcare decision-making. Future research should investigate how SWD appraisals change over time and with deterioration of health and how they depend on societal acceptance of health impairments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-281706
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is it worse than death? Appraisal of health states among older adults and their relatives in Switzerland

Giulia A.L. Fischer, Florian Riese, Anton Gietl, Esmeralda Gruber et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Is it worse than death? Appraisal of health states among older adults and their relatives in Switzerland

Giulia A.L. Fischer, Florian Riese, Anton Gietl, Esmeralda Gruber, U. Hock, Andreas Buchmann, Verena Schwegler
article en

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to study health state appraisals in healthy older Swiss with a focus on health deficits typically associated with dementia. We also aimed to elucidate the congruency of self-ratings of health states with proxy-ratings by possible future surrogate decision-makers. Methods: This is a single-center, cross-sectional survey among a convenience sample of pairs of healthy older adults and their possible future surrogate decision-makers. Following a States Worse Than Death (SWD) approach, participants were asked to appraise health deficit states in relation to death both for themselves and for their dyadic partners. Results: The final sample consisted of 248 participants, i.e. 124 pairs of healthy older adults (62.1% male; mean age: 71.6ys (SD: 10.5ys)) and their possible future surrogate decisionmakers (mostly spouses or children). Of the 17 health states included in the survey, eleven were rated as equal or worse than death by more than half of healthy older adults. Similarly, ten health states were rated as equal or worse than death by more than half of possible future surrogate decision-makers. Overall, there was good - and higher than random - congruency between ratings of dyadic partners. Discussion: Participants of our study preferred death over living with various types of health impairments to a striking extent, particularly those associated with dementia. There was a good consistency of health state appraisals between dyadic partners which could translate into consistent decision-making - in case proxy decision-making were to become necessary. The use of patient-centered health measures such as SWD approaches may aid goals-of-care discussions, facilitate end-of-life communications and thus improve healthcare decision-making. Future research should investigate how SWD appraisals change over time and with deterioration of health and how they depend on societal acceptance of health impairments.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is it worse than death? Appraisal of health states among older adults and their relatives in Switzerland — Giulia A.L. Fischer, Florian Riese, et al. · Universität Zürich, ZORA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS