Scaling-up city farms: a model for growth and resilience

The paper argues that city farms form networks of co-dependency at the scale of urban villages within the city, and are motivated by a need to repair and care for the socio-material landscape. In so doing, they develop a local ethos of sustainability, more immediately experienced in rural communities than necessarily our cities. City farms are local not-for-profit, uncertain microcosms of the city; microcosms because they practically and ethically interweave simple and complex ‘activities’ to achieve stability. Uncertain, because to be sustainable, their futures rely on the gifting of land and labour, where care is reciprocal with a community's formation. The research presents city farms as an attempt to repair this condition by prioritising autonomy as “care-in-common” (Esposito, 2013) through practices of ‘task’ and ‘gift’, arguing that their ‘motivational’ and ‘operational’ practices are an attempt to undermine the ‘partitioning’ of existence. The paper will example how ‘city farms’ provide a motivational and operational model to stabilise and sustain uncertainty through a co-dependency of ‘care’, using live projects, told as a series of ethno-graphic portraits from workers on the farms. In arguing that their practices are testimonies attempting to repair our modern lifestyle, it will show how these city farms develop, and what their contribution might be in providing a model to re-think an unpartitioned life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Published
2026-05-01
Primary Topic
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaling-up city farms: a model for growth and resilience

Jane Ellen McAllister
London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
article

Scaling-up city farms: a model for growth and resilience

Jane Ellen McAllister
article en

Abstract

The paper argues that city farms form networks of co-dependency at the scale of urban villages within the city, and are motivated by a need to repair and care for the socio-material landscape. In so doing, they develop a local ethos of sustainability, more immediately experienced in rural communities than necessarily our cities. City farms are local not-for-profit, uncertain microcosms of the city; microcosms because they practically and ethically interweave simple and complex ‘activities’ to achieve stability. Uncertain, because to be sustainable, their futures rely on the gifting of land and labour, where care is reciprocal with a community's formation. The research presents city farms as an attempt to repair this condition by prioritising autonomy as “care-in-common” (Esposito, 2013) through practices of ‘task’ and ‘gift’, arguing that their ‘motivational’ and ‘operational’ practices are an attempt to undermine the ‘partitioning’ of existence. The paper will example how ‘city farms’ provide a motivational and operational model to stabilise and sustain uncertainty through a co-dependency of ‘care’, using live projects, told as a series of ethno-graphic portraits from workers on the farms. In arguing that their practices are testimonies attempting to repair our modern lifestyle, it will show how these city farms develop, and what their contribution might be in providing a model to re-think an unpartitioned life.

London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.