Ali sem ravnokar videl Romea storiti samomor? Meinong in Blaustein o gledališču
I analyze the aesthetic experience of theatergoers in light of Meinong’s “assumptions” and Blaustein’s “imaginative presentations,” taking Brentano’s “universality thesis” as the background of my analyses. I argue that “presentations” and “judgments” go hand in hand, as far as theater experience is concerned. To put forth my main argument, I follow a two-fold line of reasoning: phenomenological and ontological. On the phenomenological level, Blaustein’s imaginative presentations, I argue, are self-sufficient. Nonetheless, on the ontological level, the theater’s represented objects emerge as having a two-sided structure that undermines the phenomenological simplicity of presentations. By characterizing represented objects’ ontology in this manner, I admit Meinong’s assumptions as a fourth class of mental phenomena, and, beyond the frameworks of both Meinong and Blaustein, incorporate judgments into the aesthetic experience of theater.
Authors
- Hicham Jakha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-4100)
Publication Details
- Journal
- DiRROS repository (University of Maribor)
- Published
- 2025-12-23
- Primary Topic
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00