Can machine translation really help minority languages in Europe?

Machine translation (MT) has greatly improved its quality in the last decade and has become nearly omnipresent in all aspects of society. Neural MT (NMT) and, more recently, large language models (LLMs) such as the generative pretrained transformer (GPT) have made translations to many languages easily accessible to all users from any phone or computer. However, most MT models are English-centric and only produce good quality results for those languages with great amounts of data. For minority languages, the challenge is often understood as the scarcity of data, although systemic differences between language communities should be taken into account if MT systems for these languages are meant to be really useful. In this paper, we use value scenarios to imagine the systemic impacts for two languages with differentiated sociolinguistic realities: Catalan and Karelian. The goal is to outline the main challenges and potential harms when considering MT for minority languages and to suggest some general guidelines that should be followed in future research and applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Published
2026-01-12
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can machine translation really help minority languages in Europe?

Sergi Alvarez-Vidal, Maarit Koponen
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Can machine translation really help minority languages in Europe?

Sergi Alvarez-Vidal, Maarit Koponen
article en

Abstract

Machine translation (MT) has greatly improved its quality in the last decade and has become nearly omnipresent in all aspects of society. Neural MT (NMT) and, more recently, large language models (LLMs) such as the generative pretrained transformer (GPT) have made translations to many languages easily accessible to all users from any phone or computer. However, most MT models are English-centric and only produce good quality results for those languages with great amounts of data. For minority languages, the challenge is often understood as the scarcity of data, although systemic differences between language communities should be taken into account if MT systems for these languages are meant to be really useful. In this paper, we use value scenarios to imagine the systemic impacts for two languages with differentiated sociolinguistic realities: Catalan and Karelian. The goal is to outline the main challenges and potential harms when considering MT for minority languages and to suggest some general guidelines that should be followed in future research and applications.

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can machine translation really help minority languages in Europe? — Sergi Alvarez-Vidal, Maarit Koponen · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS