Vernacular Translations of Aristotle's Metaphor in Medieval Italy

Abstract: This article explores the reception of Aristotle's Rhetoric in medieval Italy, with a specific focus on the relationship between metaphor and the etymology of translation, both rooted in the concept of transfer. It examines how Aristotle's term μεταφορά was translated into the vernacular, offering insights into the interplay between translation practice and concurrent developments in rhetorical culture. After introducing the two earliest Italian vernacular translations of the Rhetoric , both documented in fourteenth-century manuscripts, the article addresses the dichotomy between "ordinary" and "foreign" central to Aristotle's discourse on metaphor, showing that it aligns with linguistic distinctions in the medieval lexicon of vernacular translation, exemplified by terms like volgarizzamento (vulgarization) and volgarizzare (to vulgarize). One particularly illuminating example of this dichotomy's relevance to the linguistic appropriation of Aristotle's rhetorical lexicon is the merging of the Latin term transumptio (used in both rhetoric and logic) with the concept of metaphor ( translatio ) discussed in the final section of the essay. By conducting a comparative analysis of select passages from the two vernacular translations and their source texts, the essay also uncovers the profound cultural and linguistic intricacies inherent in the vernacular transmission of Aristotle's Rhetoric , which, in conjunction with its Latin translations, intersected with other crucial facets of Aristotelian reception, including, though in mediated ways, the Greek and Arabic traditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital philology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/dph.2025.a979924
Primary Topic
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vernacular Translations of Aristotle's Metaphor in Medieval Italy

Eugenio Refini
Digital philology
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
article

Vernacular Translations of Aristotle's Metaphor in Medieval Italy

Eugenio Refini
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores the reception of Aristotle's Rhetoric in medieval Italy, with a specific focus on the relationship between metaphor and the etymology of translation, both rooted in the concept of transfer. It examines how Aristotle's term μεταφορά was translated into the vernacular, offering insights into the interplay between translation practice and concurrent developments in rhetorical culture. After introducing the two earliest Italian vernacular translations of the Rhetoric , both documented in fourteenth-century manuscripts, the article addresses the dichotomy between "ordinary" and "foreign" central to Aristotle's discourse on metaphor, showing that it aligns with linguistic distinctions in the medieval lexicon of vernacular translation, exemplified by terms like volgarizzamento (vulgarization) and volgarizzare (to vulgarize). One particularly illuminating example of this dichotomy's relevance to the linguistic appropriation of Aristotle's rhetorical lexicon is the merging of the Latin term transumptio (used in both rhetoric and logic) with the concept of metaphor ( translatio ) discussed in the final section of the essay. By conducting a comparative analysis of select passages from the two vernacular translations and their source texts, the essay also uncovers the profound cultural and linguistic intricacies inherent in the vernacular transmission of Aristotle's Rhetoric , which, in conjunction with its Latin translations, intersected with other crucial facets of Aristotelian reception, including, though in mediated ways, the Greek and Arabic traditions.

Digital philologyVol. 14(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.