Abortion and Infant Mortality: Termination Does Not Prevent Death

Alison Gemmill <i>et al</i>. claim that infant mortality in Texas increased following its 2021 abortion restrictions, and several sources reported that abortion restrictions harm infants. This is misleading. Gemmill <i>et al</i>.'s findings show that infant deaths increased primarily because abortion for "congenital anomalies" decreased, and a subset of those subjects died in infancy. In other words, infant mortality rose because fetal mortality fell. By analogy, one can reduce teenage deaths by causing deaths before age thirteen, but this does not save lives. Likewise, abortion restrictions may lead to more infants dying (since fewer subjects are aborted), but this does not imply that abortion restrictions harm infants. The opposite seems true. We argue that it is reasonable to regard Texas's abortion restrictions as a net benefit for infants. We also highlight ableist assumptions surrounding Gemmill <i>et al</i>.'s study and call for bipartisan efforts to support people with disabilities and their families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The New Bioethics
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2025.2589634
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abortion and Infant Mortality: Termination Does Not Prevent Death

Nicholas Colgrove, Monica Snyder
The New Bioethics
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Abortion and Infant Mortality: Termination Does Not Prevent Death

Nicholas Colgrove, Monica Snyder
article en

Abstract

Alison Gemmill <i>et al</i>. claim that infant mortality in Texas increased following its 2021 abortion restrictions, and several sources reported that abortion restrictions harm infants. This is misleading. Gemmill <i>et al</i>.'s findings show that infant deaths increased primarily because abortion for "congenital anomalies" decreased, and a subset of those subjects died in infancy. In other words, infant mortality rose because fetal mortality fell. By analogy, one can reduce teenage deaths by causing deaths before age thirteen, but this does not save lives. Likewise, abortion restrictions may lead to more infants dying (since fewer subjects are aborted), but this does not imply that abortion restrictions harm infants. The opposite seems true. We argue that it is reasonable to regard Texas's abortion restrictions as a net benefit for infants. We also highlight ableist assumptions surrounding Gemmill <i>et al</i>.'s study and call for bipartisan efforts to support people with disabilities and their families.

The New BioethicsVol. 32(1)
Augusta University Health (US), Film Independent (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abortion and Infant Mortality: Termination Does Not Prevent Death — Nicholas Colgrove, Monica Snyder · The New Bioethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS