GLOBAL TRADE WARS AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK: INTERNATIONAL LAW IN A FRAGMENTED WORLD

Global Trade Wars and Legal Framework: International Law in a Fragmented World examines the growing tensions in the global trading system arising from tariff disputes, economic nationalism, and strategic competition among states. It explores how trade wars challenge the foundations of international economic law, particularly the rules-based framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO), regional trade agreements, and bilateral arrangements. The study analyzes the legal justifications invoked by states—such as national security, safeguard measures, and retaliatory tariffs—and assesses their consistency with established international law principles. In a world marked by fragmentation, unilateralism, and weakening multilateral institutions, the work highlights the increasing role of regionalism, power asymmetries, and geopolitical interests in shaping trade relations. It also evaluates the impact of trade conflicts on developing countries and the future of global economic governance, emphasizing the need for legal reform and renewed cooperation to restore stability and predictability in international trade.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18277883
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GLOBAL TRADE WARS AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK: INTERNATIONAL LAW IN A FRAGMENTED WORLD

Anantjit Publication
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
World Trade Organization Law
article

GLOBAL TRADE WARS AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK: INTERNATIONAL LAW IN A FRAGMENTED WORLD

Anantjit Publication
article en

Abstract

Global Trade Wars and Legal Framework: International Law in a Fragmented World examines the growing tensions in the global trading system arising from tariff disputes, economic nationalism, and strategic competition among states. It explores how trade wars challenge the foundations of international economic law, particularly the rules-based framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO), regional trade agreements, and bilateral arrangements. The study analyzes the legal justifications invoked by states—such as national security, safeguard measures, and retaliatory tariffs—and assesses their consistency with established international law principles. In a world marked by fragmentation, unilateralism, and weakening multilateral institutions, the work highlights the increasing role of regionalism, power asymmetries, and geopolitical interests in shaping trade relations. It also evaluates the impact of trade conflicts on developing countries and the future of global economic governance, emphasizing the need for legal reform and renewed cooperation to restore stability and predictability in international trade.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.