The political integration of armed groups in a changing global security landscape:Implications for sustainable peace

This paper discusses the prospects for political integration of armed groups in the context of contemporary dynamics of armed conflict. While the conversion of insurgent movements into political actors is not new, shifting global conflict dynamics are challenging the established liberal peace framework. Drawing on insights from comparative case studies of both negotiated settlements and rebel victories, the paper argues that wartime organisational cohesion, governance capacity, ideology, and external engagement decisively shape prospects or post-war political integration of armed groups. It introduces a novel typology that highlights diverse pathways towards and constraints to demilitarisation and party formation. The analysis offers policy recommendations tailored to group type and context, situated within contemporary conflict environments marked by fragmentation and internationalisation. Ultimately, the paper argues that sustainable peace requires recognising rebel legacies, supporting incremental reforms, and fostering inclusive governance in the long term.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2026-02-04
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The political integration of armed groups in a changing global security landscape:Implications for sustainable peace

Gyda Marås Sindre
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

The political integration of armed groups in a changing global security landscape:Implications for sustainable peace

Gyda Marås Sindre
article en

Abstract

This paper discusses the prospects for political integration of armed groups in the context of contemporary dynamics of armed conflict. While the conversion of insurgent movements into political actors is not new, shifting global conflict dynamics are challenging the established liberal peace framework. Drawing on insights from comparative case studies of both negotiated settlements and rebel victories, the paper argues that wartime organisational cohesion, governance capacity, ideology, and external engagement decisively shape prospects or post-war political integration of armed groups. It introduces a novel typology that highlights diverse pathways towards and constraints to demilitarisation and party formation. The analysis offers policy recommendations tailored to group type and context, situated within contemporary conflict environments marked by fragmentation and internationalisation. Ultimately, the paper argues that sustainable peace requires recognising rebel legacies, supporting incremental reforms, and fostering inclusive governance in the long term.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.