Human‐Machine Mutual Trust Based Shared Control Framework for Intelligent Vehicles

Due to technological bottlenecks in highly autonomous driving, human‐machine co‐driving will remain a transitional mode for the foreseeable future. As a promising paradigm, shared control allocates control authority adaptively by modeling interactions between humans and machines. However, existing methods often rely on rational game‐theoretic formulations that overlook psychological factors like trust, thereby limiting robustness to unexpected environmental variations. To address this limitation, this paper develops a shared control framework driven by bidirectional trust modeling between humans and machines. First, a human factors‐aware human‐to‐machine trust model is introduced, which derives trust estimates from intention discrepancies between the driver and the machine and refines them through driver‐skill assessments updated in a Bayesian framework. Second, a machine‐to‐human trust estimation model is introduced, which generates estimates from a comprehensive assessment of driving ability, integrating long‐term skills with short‐term states through a game‐theoretic mechanism. Finally, these trust estimates are mapped into control authority allocations and integrated into a model predictive control for generating shared control commands. Experiments with 25 drivers on the SILAB hardware‐in‐the‐loop platform validated the proposed framework. Results show high accuracy in trust estimation and demonstrate that the trust‐driven strategy achieves superior safety and human‐machine consistency compared with risk‐based approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Intelligent Systems
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202501155
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human‐Machine Mutual Trust Based Shared Control Framework for Intelligent Vehicles

Z. R. Li, Zhishuai Yin, Xukai Zhai, Qian Li et al.
Advanced Intelligent Systems
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Human‐Machine Mutual Trust Based Shared Control Framework for Intelligent Vehicles

Z. R. Li, Zhishuai Yin, Xukai Zhai, Qian Li, Jinhui Gao
article en

Abstract

Due to technological bottlenecks in highly autonomous driving, human‐machine co‐driving will remain a transitional mode for the foreseeable future. As a promising paradigm, shared control allocates control authority adaptively by modeling interactions between humans and machines. However, existing methods often rely on rational game‐theoretic formulations that overlook psychological factors like trust, thereby limiting robustness to unexpected environmental variations. To address this limitation, this paper develops a shared control framework driven by bidirectional trust modeling between humans and machines. First, a human factors‐aware human‐to‐machine trust model is introduced, which derives trust estimates from intention discrepancies between the driver and the machine and refines them through driver‐skill assessments updated in a Bayesian framework. Second, a machine‐to‐human trust estimation model is introduced, which generates estimates from a comprehensive assessment of driving ability, integrating long‐term skills with short‐term states through a game‐theoretic mechanism. Finally, these trust estimates are mapped into control authority allocations and integrated into a model predictive control for generating shared control commands. Experiments with 25 drivers on the SILAB hardware‐in‐the‐loop platform validated the proposed framework. Results show high accuracy in trust estimation and demonstrate that the trust‐driven strategy achieves superior safety and human‐machine consistency compared with risk‐based approaches.

Advanced Intelligent Systems
Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Ji Hua Laboratory (CN), Hubei University of Automotive Technology (CN), Hubei University of Technology (CN)
Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.