Crack depth measurement and 3D reconstruction for concrete structures: A review

Crack depth and three-dimensional (3D) morphology are critical for assessing durability and capacity in concrete bridges, yet routine inspections remain surface-focused. This recent review synthesizes advances in non-destructive evaluation (NDE) for quantitative crack depth and 3D reconstruction, emphasizing concrete material and bridge-scale applications. Methods are grouped by sensing physics: Ultrasonics, Ground-penetrating radar/electromagnetics, and Optical/Thermal approches. A staged workflow emerges: fast noncontact screening, volumetric localization, and defensible depth confirmation, with optional 3D reconstruction where morphology drives decisions. We highlight integration into finite-element (FE) models via surface meshes, volumetric fields, and scalar depths, all with uncertainty propagation. Remaining challenges include calibration, reinforcement effects, environmental variability, and lack of bridge-scale ground truth. Standardized benchmarks, multimodal fusion, and automation are identified as key levers for advancing from pilots to routine practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aiac68175.2025.11332509
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crack depth measurement and 3D reconstruction for concrete structures: A review

David Bassir, Mingjun Zhang, Anicet Barrios, Haochen Chang
Geophysical Methods and Applications
article

Crack depth measurement and 3D reconstruction for concrete structures: A review

David Bassir, Mingjun Zhang, Anicet Barrios, Haochen Chang
article en

Abstract

Crack depth and three-dimensional (3D) morphology are critical for assessing durability and capacity in concrete bridges, yet routine inspections remain surface-focused. This recent review synthesizes advances in non-destructive evaluation (NDE) for quantitative crack depth and 3D reconstruction, emphasizing concrete material and bridge-scale applications. Methods are grouped by sensing physics: Ultrasonics, Ground-penetrating radar/electromagnetics, and Optical/Thermal approches. A staged workflow emerges: fast noncontact screening, volumetric localization, and defensible depth confirmation, with optional 3D reconstruction where morphology drives decisions. We highlight integration into finite-element (FE) models via surface meshes, volumetric fields, and scalar depths, all with uncertainty propagation. Remaining challenges include calibration, reinforcement effects, environmental variability, and lack of bridge-scale ground truth. Standardized benchmarks, multimodal fusion, and automation are identified as key levers for advancing from pilots to routine practice.

Université de Technologie de Compiègne (FR), Dongguan University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crack depth measurement and 3D reconstruction for concrete structures: A review — David Bassir, Mingjun Zhang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS