Crude pineapple extract inhibits WHO priority groups bacteria that are causing skin and soft tissue infections: A cost-effective alternative in the fight against AMR

Background: The escalating global crisis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has rendered many frontline antibiotics ineffective, particularly against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria such as carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CarbR), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). With limited new antibiotics entering the pipeline and high costs of drug development, there is growing interest in affordable, eco-friendly alternatives from plant-derived compounds. Pineapple (Ananas comosus), particularly its bromelain-rich peel and crown, contains bioactive phytochemicals with reported antibacterial properties. This study evaluated the antibacterial activity of crude pineapple extracts against MDR pathogens associated with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Methodology: This laboratory-based experimental study (May–July 2025) utilized 15 archived clinical isolates of CarbR P. aeruginosa (5), ESBL E. coli (5), and MRSA (5) from the Bugando Medical Centre. Isolates were revived, re-characterized, and tested for susceptibility following CLSI guidelines. Crude bromelain extracts were prepared from pineapple fruit, peel, and crown using ethanol maceration followed by rotary evaporation, and finally drying. Extracts were tested for antibacterial activity via broth micro-dilution assays to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), with experiments performed in triplicate. Results: Peel extract exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity with MICs of 12.5% for CarbR P. aeruginosa and 25% for both ESBL E. coli and MRSA. While crown extract showed MICs of 12.5%, 25%, and 50% against the same pathogens, while fruit extract demonstrated weaker activity, requiring 100% concentration against ESBL E. coli and MRSA. Conclusion: Crude pineapple peel and crown extracts demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against WHO-priority MDR pathogens. Further work should isolate and characterize bioactive compounds from crude pineapple peel and crown extracts for clinical translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liverpool John Moores University
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24377/jnpd.article3432
Primary Topic
Pineapple and bromelain studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crude pineapple extract inhibits WHO priority groups bacteria that are causing skin and soft tissue infections: A cost-effective alternative in the fight against AMR

Johannes Rukyaa, Abdul Kidukuli, Hawa Hassan Mzee, Jeremiah Seni et al.
Liverpool John Moores University
Pineapple and bromelain studies
article

Crude pineapple extract inhibits WHO priority groups bacteria that are causing skin and soft tissue infections: A cost-effective alternative in the fight against AMR

Johannes Rukyaa, Abdul Kidukuli, Hawa Hassan Mzee, Jeremiah Seni, Vitus Silago, Prisca , Prince Kachira, Grace Ntambi, Tecla M. Joseph, Stephen E. Mshana
article en

Abstract

Background: The escalating global crisis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has rendered many frontline antibiotics ineffective, particularly against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria such as carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CarbR), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). With limited new antibiotics entering the pipeline and high costs of drug development, there is growing interest in affordable, eco-friendly alternatives from plant-derived compounds. Pineapple (Ananas comosus), particularly its bromelain-rich peel and crown, contains bioactive phytochemicals with reported antibacterial properties. This study evaluated the antibacterial activity of crude pineapple extracts against MDR pathogens associated with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Methodology: This laboratory-based experimental study (May–July 2025) utilized 15 archived clinical isolates of CarbR P. aeruginosa (5), ESBL E. coli (5), and MRSA (5) from the Bugando Medical Centre. Isolates were revived, re-characterized, and tested for susceptibility following CLSI guidelines. Crude bromelain extracts were prepared from pineapple fruit, peel, and crown using ethanol maceration followed by rotary evaporation, and finally drying. Extracts were tested for antibacterial activity via broth micro-dilution assays to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), with experiments performed in triplicate. Results: Peel extract exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity with MICs of 12.5% for CarbR P. aeruginosa and 25% for both ESBL E. coli and MRSA. While crown extract showed MICs of 12.5%, 25%, and 50% against the same pathogens, while fruit extract demonstrated weaker activity, requiring 100% concentration against ESBL E. coli and MRSA. Conclusion: Crude pineapple peel and crown extracts demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against WHO-priority MDR pathogens. Further work should isolate and characterize bioactive compounds from crude pineapple peel and crown extracts for clinical translation.

Liverpool John Moores University
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Pineapple and bromelain studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.