Analytical Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Calculation for Point Source

Abstract—A number of specialized software packages have now been developed for calculating seismic hazard curves. Their algorithmic basis involves the application of numerical methods. A key feature of such calculations is the discretization of the identified earthquake focal zones (EFZ): each zone is divided into finite elements, with each element having seismic activity proportional to its area. In this case, in calculations, the magnitudes of earthquakes also take a discrete set of values. Numerical methods definitely make it possible to solve problems that cannot be described analytically, but they also introduce certain errors. Too coarse a division may not take into account local features of the seismic regime. The accuracy of the final results depends significantly on two key parameters: the selected magnitude discretization step and the principles of dividing EFZs. In this study, we consider a localized seismic source whose event flow strictly follows the Gutenberg–Richter law. To determine the intensity of seismic vibrations, the Shebalin macroseismic field equation is used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s106935132570079x
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Calculation for Point Source

R. N. Vakarchuk
Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Analytical Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Calculation for Point Source

R. N. Vakarchuk
article en

Abstract

Abstract—A number of specialized software packages have now been developed for calculating seismic hazard curves. Their algorithmic basis involves the application of numerical methods. A key feature of such calculations is the discretization of the identified earthquake focal zones (EFZ): each zone is divided into finite elements, with each element having seismic activity proportional to its area. In this case, in calculations, the magnitudes of earthquakes also take a discrete set of values. Numerical methods definitely make it possible to solve problems that cannot be described analytically, but they also introduce certain errors. Too coarse a division may not take into account local features of the seismic regime. The accuracy of the final results depends significantly on two key parameters: the selected magnitude discretization step and the principles of dividing EFZs. In this study, we consider a localized seismic source whose event flow strictly follows the Gutenberg–Richter law. To determine the intensity of seismic vibrations, the Shebalin macroseismic field equation is used.

Izvestiya Physics of the Solid EarthVol. 61(6)
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth (RU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.