Against Definition: Two Monies and the American Revolution

Defining money and making the definition stick are political acts with a history. Arguments about the nature of money are part of this process. The question of the fundamental basis of money in law, the state, or exchange is less about history and more about the present. Definitions of money have also marked the boundaries of our historical imaginations. Historians have long been interested in making definitions as accurate and rich as possible. However, they have sometimes confused defining money for monetary history itself. Definitions are in tension with history. The American Revolution is a case in point. If we approach the monetary dimensions of that conflict with a preconceived definition, we miss the deep, specific monetary and social divisions between the two warring parties and the crucial imperial dimensions of the conflict itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Historical Studies
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737707
Citations
1
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Against Definition: Two Monies and the American Revolution

Andrew David Edwards
1 citations
Critical Historical Studies
American Constitutional Law and Politics
8.52
article

Against Definition: Two Monies and the American Revolution

Andrew David Edwards
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Defining money and making the definition stick are political acts with a history. Arguments about the nature of money are part of this process. The question of the fundamental basis of money in law, the state, or exchange is less about history and more about the present. Definitions of money have also marked the boundaries of our historical imaginations. Historians have long been interested in making definitions as accurate and rich as possible. However, they have sometimes confused defining money for monetary history itself. Definitions are in tension with history. The American Revolution is a case in point. If we approach the monetary dimensions of that conflict with a preconceived definition, we miss the deep, specific monetary and social divisions between the two warring parties and the crucial imperial dimensions of the conflict itself.

Critical Historical StudiesVol. 12(2)
University of St Andrews (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.