Theophrastus Transmitting Empedocles

Theophrastus speaks of the kinship between living beings in connection with Empedocles in several of his works. In De Causis Plantarum 1.7.1, 1.13.2, and 1.21.5, he quotes and assesses Empedocles’ observations concerning plants and animals and their functional and structural similarities. In De Sensibus 12 and 23, he discusses and criticizes Empedocles’ explanation of perception and cognition, which does not differentiate between animate and inanimate beings. Finally, in the sec­tion of Porphyry’s De Abstinentia, which borrows from Theophrastus’ treatise De Pietate (2.11–21), both Empedocles and Theophrastus are mentioned as advocates of abstinence from animal sacrifices. The article discusses these and related passages and motivations behind Empedocles’ and Theophrastus’ observations of kinship. It argues that, whatever their motivations, the observed similarities between living beings may have served to support their ethical and religious views – Empedocles’ belief in reincarnation and Theophrastus’ advocacy of abstaining from animal sacrifices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Clotho
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4312/clotho.7.2.185-202
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theophrastus Transmitting Empedocles

Sandra Šćepanović
Clotho
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Theophrastus Transmitting Empedocles

Sandra Šćepanović
article en

Abstract

Theophrastus speaks of the kinship between living beings in connection with Empedocles in several of his works. In De Causis Plantarum 1.7.1, 1.13.2, and 1.21.5, he quotes and assesses Empedocles’ observations concerning plants and animals and their functional and structural similarities. In De Sensibus 12 and 23, he discusses and criticizes Empedocles’ explanation of perception and cognition, which does not differentiate between animate and inanimate beings. Finally, in the sec­tion of Porphyry’s De Abstinentia, which borrows from Theophrastus’ treatise De Pietate (2.11–21), both Empedocles and Theophrastus are mentioned as advocates of abstinence from animal sacrifices. The article discusses these and related passages and motivations behind Empedocles’ and Theophrastus’ observations of kinship. It argues that, whatever their motivations, the observed similarities between living beings may have served to support their ethical and religious views – Empedocles’ belief in reincarnation and Theophrastus’ advocacy of abstaining from animal sacrifices.

ClothoVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.