Chemicals in homes and gardens: understanding sources, exposure and risk

Chemicals are ubiquitous in our homes and gardens. However, the properties that make some chemicals favourable, like medicinal benefits or water repellence, can also make them harmful to human health. This study examined over 100 chemicals in indoor dust, vegetable patch soil and backyard soil (132 samples), and over 900 additional chemicals in a subset of indoor dust samples (6 samples), to explore chemical presence and risk to human health in residential settings. Trace metals, per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were frequently present in dust, while pesticides were infrequently detected. For PFAS, soil primarily contained carboxylic acids (PFCAs) and sulfonic acids (PFSAs), while dust contained a range of PFAS precursors. Anomalously elevated total recoverable hydrocarbons (TRH) in dust were found to be from natural human oils, rather than crude oil that health-based guidelines are protective of. Presence of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and their metabolites suggests indoor dust is a reservoir of both chemical presence, and past human exposure. Flooring (e.g., carpets), soil concentrations, and traffic density had the greatest influence on chemical presence in dust. Health risk screening found that the ingestion of 99.5% (183/184) of chemicals in dust assessed was below the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). The exception was lead (Pb), which was only above the TTC in one home, shown to be impacted by legacy Pb paint contamination. From the broad analysis undertaken, we suggest that future work prioritise reducing exposure to key risk drivers, like Pb in urban environments, while continuing to monitor PFAS as knowledge of toxicity evolves. We further recommend ongoing exploration of the utility of tools like the TTC to improve risk assessment efficiency for environmental exposures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment International
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2026.110071
Primary Topic
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemicals in homes and gardens: understanding sources, exposure and risk

Antti Mikkonen, Kara Fry, John Leeder, Maryam Moslehi et al.
Environment International
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
article

Chemicals in homes and gardens: understanding sources, exposure and risk

Antti Mikkonen, Kara Fry, John Leeder, Maryam Moslehi, Jennifer Martin, Xiaochi Liu, Mark Patrick Taylor
article en

Abstract

Chemicals are ubiquitous in our homes and gardens. However, the properties that make some chemicals favourable, like medicinal benefits or water repellence, can also make them harmful to human health. This study examined over 100 chemicals in indoor dust, vegetable patch soil and backyard soil (132 samples), and over 900 additional chemicals in a subset of indoor dust samples (6 samples), to explore chemical presence and risk to human health in residential settings. Trace metals, per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were frequently present in dust, while pesticides were infrequently detected. For PFAS, soil primarily contained carboxylic acids (PFCAs) and sulfonic acids (PFSAs), while dust contained a range of PFAS precursors. Anomalously elevated total recoverable hydrocarbons (TRH) in dust were found to be from natural human oils, rather than crude oil that health-based guidelines are protective of. Presence of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and their metabolites suggests indoor dust is a reservoir of both chemical presence, and past human exposure. Flooring (e.g., carpets), soil concentrations, and traffic density had the greatest influence on chemical presence in dust. Health risk screening found that the ingestion of 99.5% (183/184) of chemicals in dust assessed was below the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). The exception was lead (Pb), which was only above the TTC in one home, shown to be impacted by legacy Pb paint contamination. From the broad analysis undertaken, we suggest that future work prioritise reducing exposure to key risk drivers, like Pb in urban environments, while continuing to monitor PFAS as knowledge of toxicity evolves. We further recommend ongoing exploration of the utility of tools like the TTC to improve risk assessment efficiency for environmental exposures.

Environment InternationalVol. 208
NSW Department of Planning and Environment (AU), Fairfield Hospital (AU), Victoria Park (CA), Environmental Protection Agency (DK), Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.